Energy and cost impacts of relay and femtocell deployments in long-term-evolution advanced

Energy and cost impacts of relay and femtocell deployments in long-term-evolution advanced

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In long-term-evolution-advanced (LTE-advanced), heterogeneous deployments of relays, femtocells and conventional macrocells are expected to provide coverage extension and throughput enhancement, while significantly lowering the energy consumption and total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) in cellular networks. This study presents a methodology for estimating the total energy consumption, taking into account the total operational power and embodied energy, and TCO of wireless cellular networks, and in particular provides a means to compare homogeneous and heterogeneous network (HetNets) deployments. The authors introduce realistic energy models and energy metrics based on information available from mobile-network operators (MNOs) and base stations manufacturers. Additionally, up-to-date operational and capital expenditure (OPEX and CAPEX) models are used to calculate TCO of candidate networks. The authors evaluate two scenarios for HetNets, namely a joint macro-relay network and a joint macro–femtocell network, with different relay and femtocell deployments densities. The results obtained show that compared to macro-centric networks, joint macro-relay networks are both energy and cost efficient, whereas joint macro–femtocell networks reduce the networks TCO at the expense of increased energy-consumption. Finally, it is observed that energy and cost gains are highly sensitive to the OPEX model adopted.


    1. 1)
      • Femtocells – natural solution for offload, a femto forum topic brief, Published by the Femto Forum June 2010,, accessed July 2011.
    2. 2)
      • Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update. 2009–2014,, accessed July 2011.
    3. 3)
      • CTIA Semi-Annual Wireless Industry Survey, Year-End 2010 top-line survey results,, accessed July 2011.
    4. 4)
      • G. Auer , I. Godor , L. Hevizi . (2010) The EARTH project: towards energy efficient wireless networks.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 3GPP TR 36.814 V2.0.0: ‘Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects’, March 2010.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • S. Saunders , S. Carlaw , A. Giustina . (2009) Femtocells: opportunities and challenges for business and technology.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Beniero, T., Redana, S., Hämäläinen, J., Raaf, B.: `Effect of relaying on coverage in 3GPP LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring Conf., April 2009, Barcelona, Spain.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Lang, E., Redana, S., Raff, B.: `Business impact of relay deployment for coverage extension in 3GPP LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE ICC Conf., June 2009, Dresden, Germany.
    14. 14)
      • The Green Radio Project Core 5,, accessed July 2011.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • In-Stat, mobile communications 2008: green thinking beyond TCO consideration,, accessed July 2011.
    17. 17)
      • Consultant value added: ‘Mobile operators are spending three times more on opex than on capital expenditure’, Published online – 22 June 2008,, accessed July 2011.
    18. 18)
      • Saleh, B.A., Redana, S., Raff, B., Hämäläinen, J.: `Comparison of relay and pico eNB deployments in LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE VTC-Fall Conf., Anchorage, September 2009, Alaska, USA.
    19. 19)
      • Werner, M., Moberg, P., Skillermark, P.: `Cost assessment and optimization methods for multi-node radio access networks', Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring Conf., May 2008, Marina Bay, Singapore.
    20. 20)
      • Claussen, H., Calin, D.: `Macrocell offloading benefits in joint macro-and femtocell deployments', Proc. IEEE PIMRC Conf., September 2009, Tokyo, Japan.
    21. 21)
      • Claussen, H., Ho, W.T.L., Pivit, F.: `Effects of joint macrocell and residential picocell deployment on the network energy efficiency', Proc. IEEE PIMRC Conf., September 2008, Alaska, USA.
    22. 22)
      • Hou, Y., Laurenson, D.: `Energy efficiency of high QoS heterogeneous wireless communication network', Proc. IEEE VTC-Fall Conf., September 2010, Ottawa, Canada.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • Arnold, O., Richter, F., Fettweis, G., Blume, O.: `Power consumption modeling of different base station types in heterogeneous cellular networks', Proc. ICT Mobile Summit, June 2010, Florence, Italy.
    25. 25)
      • EARTH project deliverable, D2.3: ‘Energy efficiency analysis of the reference systems, areas of improvements and target breakdown’, 31 December 2010.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • Ofcom, mobile phone base-station database,, accessed July 2011.
    28. 28)
      • M. Dohler , Y. Li . (2010) Cooperative communications: hardware, channel and PHY.
    29. 29)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Dual-mode HSPA/LTE femtocell chipset (Feynman)’., accessed July 2011.
    30. 30)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Femtocell leadership interview with Shlomo Gadot Percello’., accessed July 2011.
    31. 31)
      • NEC: ‘NEC FP810 femtocell: tiny but 14.4/5.7Mbps data rates’., accessed July 2011.
    32. 32)
      • Microwave Engineering Europe: ‘PicoChip-PC7300: Low power femtocell design significantly reduces cost’., accessed July 2011.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • European Code of Conduct on Energy Consumption of Broadband Equipment, Ver. 3, November 2008.
    35. 35)
      • , : `Overview to LTE energy saving solutions to cell switch off/on', 3GPP RAN3 Meeting, Janurary 2010, Valencia, Spain, 3GPP R3–100162.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • Edler, T.: `Green base stations – how to minimize CO2 emission in operator networks', Ericsson Seminar, Bath Base Station Conf., 2008.
    39. 39)
      • Louhi, T.J., Scheck, H.O.: `Energy efficiency of cellular networks', Proc. IEEE WPMC Conf., September 2008, Lapland, Finland.
    40. 40)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Interview with picoChip CTO – D. Pulley’., accessed July 2011.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address