Sleep mode design for green base stations

Sleep mode design for green base stations

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the potential of reducing radio base station operational energy consumption is discussed in terms of deploying sleep modes. By periodically switching off the base station transmission, or using fewer transmit antennas, the energy consumption of base station hardware decreases. By delivering less control signalling overhead, the radio frequency energy consumption can also be reduced. Taking the long-term evolution system as an example, up to 90% radiated energy reduction can be obtained in low traffic conditions by employing time-domain optimisation in each radio frame. The optimum on/off duty cycle is derived, enabling the energy consumption of the base station to scale with traffic load. In the spatial domain, an antenna selection criterion is proposed, indicating the most energy-efficient antenna configuration as a function of users' locations and quality of service requirements. Without time-domain sleep modes, using fewer transmitter antennas could outperform full antenna transmission. However, with time-domain sleep modes, using all available antennas is generally the most energy-efficient choice.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • Videv, S., Haas, H., Thompson, J., Grant, P.: `Energy-efficient scheduling and bandwidth-energy efficiency tradeoff with low load', IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, Japan 2011, Kyoto.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • M.A. Marsan , L. Chiaraviglio , D. Ciullo , M. Meo . (2009) Optimal energy saving in cellular access networks.
    8. 8)
      • Gong, J., Zhou, S., Niu, Z., Yang, P.: `Traffic-aware base station sleeping in dense cellular networks', 18thInt. Workshop on Quality of Service, 2010, p. 1–2.
    9. 9)
      • Vodafone: ‘Additional information for the rationale’. 3GPP TSG-SA5 Document S5-092949, Ireland, 2009, available at
    10. 10)
      • B. Bougard , G. Lenoir , A. Dejonghe , L. Perre , F. Catthoor , W. Dehaene . Smart MIMO: An energy aware adaptive MIMO-OFDM radio link control for next generation wireless local area networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. , 3 , 1 - 15
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Vodafone: ‘Vodafone UK corporate responsibility 2008’ (Vodafone, 2008), available at
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • Richter, F., Fehske, A.J., Fettweis, G.P.: `Energy efficiency aspects of base station deployment strategies for cellular networks', IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conf., Fall, 2009, Anchorage.
    16. 16)
      • Arnold, O., Richter, F., Fettweis, G., Blume, O.: `Power consumption modeling of different base station types in heterogeneous cellular networks', Proc. Future Network and Mobile Summit 2010 Conf., 2010, available at
    17. 17)
      • H. Holma , A. Toskala . (2009) LTE for UMTS, OFDMA and SC-FDMA based radio access.
    18. 18)
      • ‘Energy saving techniques to support low load scenarios’ (Huawei, USA, 2010), available at
    19. 19)
      • Obata, Y.: `Plenary talk: creative destruction in broadband', IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, 2010, Miami, USA.
    20. 20)
      • J. Zyren , W. McCoy . Overview of the 3GPP long term evolution physical layer.
    21. 21)
      • Love, R., Kuchibhotla, R., Ghosh, A., Ratasuk, R., Classon, B., Blankenship, Y.: `Downlink control channel design for 3GPP LTE', IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., 2008, Las Vegas, USA.
    22. 22)
      • Mogensen, P., Na, W., Kovács, I.Z.: `LTE capacity compared to the shannon bound', IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2007, Dublin, Ireland.
    23. 23)
      • Ericsson: ‘LS on Intra-eNB energy saving solutions’ (Ericsson, Spain, 2010), available at
    24. 24)
      • ‘WINNER II channel models, part i: channel models’. WINNER Deliverable D1.1.2, 2007, available at
    25. 25)
      • S. Sesia , I. Toufik , M. Baker . (2009) LTE – the UMTS long term evolution: from theory to practice.
    26. 26)
      • E. Dahlman . (2007) 3G evolution: HSPA and LTE for mobile broadband.
    27. 27)
      • Papadias, C.: `On the spectral efficiency of space-time spreading schemes for multiple antenna CDMA systems', Conf. Record of the 33rd Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 1999, 1, p. 639–643.
    28. 28)
      • Laselva, D., Capozzi, F., Frederiksen, F., Pedersen, K.I., Wigard, J., Kovacs, I.Z.: `On the impact of realistic control channel constraints on QoS provisioning in UTRAN LTE', IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conf., Fall, 2009, Anchorage.
    29. 29)
      • Ghosh, A., Ratasuk, R.: ‘Hybrid automatic repeat request indicator channel’ (Steepest Ascent Ltd., 2010), available at
    30. 30)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address