Dual access points association in relay networks to conserve mobile terminals' energy

Dual access points association in relay networks to conserve mobile terminals' energy

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the authors consider the benefits of mobile terminals (MTs) with different access points (APs) for uplink and downlink transmission to conserve MTs’ energy. In traditional cellular networks, an MT is typically associated with a single AP. However, as wireless networks evolve, heterogeneous and/or overlay deployment scenario become viable and an MT can be associated with different APs for uplink and downlink transmission. The authors call this ‘dual APs association’. The authors show that allowing dual APs association provides a significant gain on the uplink system capacity and/or the uplink transmit power savings. As a specific example of the use of dual APs, the authors focus on relay networks and show that considering the relay cost further increases the benefits of this approach. Based on extensive simulations using IEEE 802.16m relay network Evaluation Methodology, the authors demonstrate that dual APs can improve the uplink harmonic capacity by 350% or reduce the uplink transmit power by 7 dB. The authors note, however, that there exists a signalling cost in implementing dual APs association, which needs be overcome to achieve these substantial performance improvements.


    1. 1)
      • J.G. Andrews , A. Ghosh , R. Muhamed . (2007) Fundamentals of WiMAX.
    2. 2)
      • H. Kim , G. de Veciana , X. Yang , M. Venkatachalam . Distributed alpha-optimal user association and cell load balancing in wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (To be published)
    3. 3)
      • K. Son , H. Kim , Y. Yi , B. Krishnamachari . Base station operation and user association mechanisms for energy-delay tradeoffs in green cellular networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , 8 , 1525 - 1536
    4. 4)
      • H. Kim , G. de Veciana . Leveraging dynamic spare capacity in wireless systems to conserve mobile terminals’ energy. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw , 3 , 802 - 815
    5. 5)
      • H. Kim , C-B. Chae , G. de Veciana , R.W. Heath Jr. . A cross-layer approach to energy efficiency for adaptive MIMO systems exploiting spare capacity. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , 8 , 4264 - 4275
    6. 6)
      • L. Fu , H. Kim , J. Huang , S.C. Liew , M. Chiang . Energy conservation and interference mitigation: from decoupling property to win-win strategy. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , 11 , 3943 - 3955
    7. 7)
      • D. Rajan , A. Sabharwal , B. Aazhang . Delay-bounded packet scheduling of bursty traffic over wireless channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 125 - 144
    8. 8)
      • 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #69 R2-101846, San Francisco, USA, 22nd–26th February, 2010.
    9. 9)
      • IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD), IEEE 802.16m-08/004r5, January 2009.
    10. 10)
      • A. Goldsmith . (2005) Wireless communications.
    11. 11)
      • 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #64 R1-110629, Taipei, 21–25 February 2011.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address