Lower bounds on mobile terminal localisation in an urban area

Lower bounds on mobile terminal localisation in an urban area

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Lower bounds on localisation errors serve as a performance indicator of how close a localisation system is to providing optimal performance. In this study, localisation of mobile terminals for urban areas is performed using received signal strength (RSS)-based techniques with maximum likelihood (ML) and linear kernel (LK) estimators. Simulations are performed with and without buildings in an urban area cell to illustrate the effect of discontinuities in the RSS profiles, on radio location accuracy. Results show that a localisation error is higher when buildings are absent as compared to the scenario when buildings are present. Buildings add extra features to the RSS measurement space which, if known to the localisation system, improve radio location accuracy. A comparison is made between the root mean-square error of the ML and LK estimators with the Cramer–Rao bound (CRB), the Bayesian Cramer–Rao bound (BCRB) and the Weiss–Weinstein bound (WWB). These comparisons show that the previously used CRB and BCRB do not provide realistic lowers bounds in the presence of buildings. In such cases bounds, such as WWB, which are capable of handling RSS discontinuities provide more realistic lower bounds on the accuracy of radio location.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • Seco, F., Jimenez, A., Prieto, C., Roa, J., Koutsou, K.: `A survey of mathematical methods for indoor localization', IEEE Int. Symp. Intelligent Signal Processing, 2009, p. 9–14.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • Robinson, M., Psaromiligkos, I.: `Received signal strength based location estimation of a wireless LAN client', IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., March 2005, 4, p. 2350–2354.
    16. 16)
      • Zhou, J., Chu, K.-K., Ng, J.-Y.: `Providing location services within a radio cellular network using ellipse propagation model', Nineteenth Int. Conf. Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2005, 1, p. 559–564.
    17. 17)
      • Teuber, A., Eissfeller, B., Pany, T.: `A two-stage fuzzy logic approach for wireless lan indoor positioning', IEEE Symp. Position, Location, and Navigation Symp., April 2006, p. 730–738.
    18. 18)
      • M. McGuire , K. Plataniotis . (2008) Localization algorithms and stratergies for wireless sensor networks.
    19. 19)
      • J.D. Parsons . (1992) The mobile radio propagation channel.
    20. 20)
      • Chen, J., Hudson, R., Yao, K.: `A maximum-likelihood parametric approach to source localizations', IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001, 5, p. 3013–3016.
    21. 21)
      • Triki, M., Slock, D.: `Mobile localization for NLOS propagation', IEEE 18th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2007, p. 1–4.
    22. 22)
      • H.L. VanTrees , K.L. Bell . (2007) Bayesian bounds for parameter estimation and nonlinear filtering/tracking.
    23. 23)
      • H. Cramer . A contribution to the theory of statistical estimation. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift , 85 - 94
    24. 24)
      • C. Rao . Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameter. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. , 81 - 95
    25. 25)
      • J. Hammersley . On estimating restricted parameters. J. R. Stat. Soc. , 192 - 240
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • Z. Ben-Haim , Y.C. Eldar . A lower bound on the Bayesian mse based on the optimal bias function, 2008 vol. abs/0804.4391.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • Chandrasekaran, G., Ergin, M., Yang, J.: `Empirical evaluation of the limits on localization using signal strength', Sixth Annual IEEE Communications Society Conf. Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2009, p. 1–9.
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • W.C. Lee . (1982) Mobile communications engineering.
    39. 39)
      • Berg, J.-E.: `Building penetration loss along urban street microcells', IEEE Seventh Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, October 1996, 3, p. 795–797.
    40. 40)
      • S.M. Kay . (1993) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory.
    41. 41)
      • Toronto downtown. Available at

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address