Design and performance evaluation of two novel linearisation circuits for giant magneto-resistance based sensors

Design and performance evaluation of two novel linearisation circuits for giant magneto-resistance based sensors

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Circuits, Devices & Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents two simple and efficient linearisation circuits for giant magneto-resistance (GMR)-based magnetic field sensors. GMR sensors are commonly available in wheatstone-bridge form, comprising two active GMR and two passive GMR elements. The output of such a sensor possesses a non-linear dependence on the input magnetic field. The proposed linearisation circuits operate on the output of a GMR sensor and provide a linear output with respect to the magnetic field. The first GMR linearisation circuit (GLC1) is based on an enhanced feedback compensation approach, while the second (GLC2) scheme uses a constant current technique. The methodologies of the schemes are described using mathematical derivations. Detailed analyses of the schemes are carried out to bring out the effects of circuit and sensor non-idealities on circuit performance. Further, the circuits were implemented on printed circuit boards and tested. Test results showed the capability of GLC1 and GLC2 to produce linear transfer characteristics. A prototype GMR sensor unit was then fabricated and tested with the developed circuits. Output non-linearity obtained during the experimentation was around 0.7%. Analyses of the results proved the superior performance of GLC1 and GLC2 over the existing schemes.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J., Vazquez-Sanchez, E.: ‘Non-destructive technique based on eddy current testing’, MDPI Sens., 2011, 11, (3), pp. 25252565.
    2. 2)
      • 2. ‘Angle Sensor: GMR-Based Angular Sensor (TLE5009)’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Reig, C., Cubells-Beltran, M.D., Munoz, D.R.: ‘Magnetic field sensors based on giant magnetoresistance (GMR) technology: applications in electrical current sensing’, MDPI Sens., 2009, 9, (10), pp. 79197942.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Vopalensky, M., Ripka, P.: ‘Precise magnetic sensors’. Proc. 4th European Magnetic Sensors and Actuators Conf., Athens, Greece, September 2003, pp. 3842.
    5. 5)
      • 5. ‘GMR Sensors Data Book’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Postolache, O., Ribeiro, A.L., Ramos, H.: ‘A novel uniform eddy current probe with GMR for non destructive testing applications’. EUROCON: Int. Conf. on Computer as a Tool, Lisbon, Portugal, April 2011, pp. 14.
    7. 7)
      • 7. ‘Application Notes for GMR Sensors’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Baibich, M.N., Broto, J.M., Fert, A.: ‘Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1988, 61, (21), pp. 24722475.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Caruso, M.J., Smith, C.H., Bratland, T., et al: ‘A new perspective on magnetic field sensing’, Sens. Mag., 1998, 15, (12), pp. 3446.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Reig, C., Freitas, S.C.D., Mukhopadhyay, S.C.: ‘Giant magnetoresistance (GMR) sensors’ (Springer, Berlin, 2013), vol. 6.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Trump, B.: ‘Analog linearization of resistance temperature detectors’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Graaf, G.D., Wolffenbuttel, R.F.: ‘Circuit for readout and linearisation of sensor bridges’. Solid-State Circuits Conf., Leuven, Belgium, September 2004, pp. 451454.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Bengtsson, L.E.: ‘Lookup table optimization for sensor linearization in small embedded systems’, J. Sens. Technol., 2012, 2, (4), pp. 177184.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lopez-Martin, A.J., Carlosena, A.: ‘Low-cost analog interface circuit for resistive bridge sensors’. 13th Int. Symp. on Communication and Information Technologies, Surat Thani, Thailand, September 2013, pp. 338341.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Sheingold, D.H.: ‘Transducer interfacing handbook: a guide to analog signal conditioning’ (Analog Devices Inc., Massachusetts, 1980, 1st edn.), pp. 100101.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Madhu-Mohan, N., Geetha, T., Sankaran, P., et al: ‘Linearization of the output of a wheatstone bridge for single active sensors’. 16th Symp. on Electrical Measurements and Instrumentation & 13th Workshop on ADC Modeling and Testing (TC4), Florence, Italy, September 2008, pp. 2529.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Jeng, J.-T., Hsu, T.-Y., Lu, C.-C.: ‘Linearized giant-magnetoresistance sensor for static field measurement’. 2nd Int. Conf. on Mechanical and Electronics Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, August 2010, pp. V1-210V1-212.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Jedlicska, I., Weiss, R., Weigel, R.: ‘Linearizing the output characteristic of GMR current sensors through hysteresis modelling’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2010, 57, (5), pp. 17281734.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Munoz, D.R., Moreno, J.S., Escriva, C.R.: ‘Constant current drive for resistive sensors based on generalized impedance converter’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2008, 57, (10), pp. 22902296.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Bluemm, C., Weiss, R., Weigel, R., et al: ‘Correcting nonlinearity and temperature influence of sensors through B-spline modeling’. IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics, Bari, Italy, July 2010, pp. 33563361.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Hoya, E.S., Casas, O., Pallas-Areny, R.: ‘Direct interface for magnetoresistive sensors’. Proc. IEEE Int. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf., Warsaw, Poland, May 2007, pp. 16.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Chavan, S., Anoop, C.S.: ‘A simple direct-digitizer for giant magneto-resistance based sensors’. Proc. IEEE Int. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf., Taipei, Taiwan, May 2016, pp. 15.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Franco, S.: ‘Circuits with resistive feedback’, in Stephen, W. (Ed.): ‘Design with operational amplifiers and analog integrated circuits’ (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002, 3rd edn.), p. 97.
    24. 24)
      • 24. ‘INA 12x Precision, Low Power Instrumentation Amplifier’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    25. 25)
      • 25. ‘OP-07 Low offset, low Drift Operational Amplifier’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.
    26. 26)
      • 26. ‘LM185/LM285/LM385 Adjustable Micropower Voltage References’. Available at, accessed 14 July 2016.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address