Your browser does not support JavaScript!

M-PRES: a statistical tool for modelling the impact of manufacturing process variations on circuit-level performance parameters

M-PRES: a statistical tool for modelling the impact of manufacturing process variations on circuit-level performance parameters

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Circuits, Devices & Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The effects of process variations on the performance of nanometre CMOS circuits have become a serious design issue, aggravated by further scaling of device dimensions. This article presents a statistical TCAD tool called Multilevel-Partitioned REsponse Surface Modelling (M-PRES) to model the impact of manufacturing process variations on circuit performance; an SRAM cell is used as a demonstration vehicle for the tool. A new non-Gaussian approach for modelling variations for sub-90 nm technologies is also presented. A comparison is made with the Monte Carlo approach, demonstrating four times (4×) computationally efficiency for M-PRES without the loss of accuracy. The M-PRES models are also re-usable reducing the computation time for the analysis of other sets of process data down to a few tens of seconds.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Giunta, A.A., Wojtkiewicz, S.F., Eldred, M.S.: `Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational simulations', 41stAIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2003, Reno, NV.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Agarwal, K., Nassif, S.: `Statistical analysis of SRAM cell stability', Design Automation Conf. (DAC), July 2006, p. 57–62.
    8. 8)
      • Borkar, S., Karnik, T., Narendra, S., Tschanz, J., Keshavarzi, A., De, V.: `Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture', Design Automation Conf., June 2003, p. 338–342.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • Ramakrishnan, H., Shedabale, S., Russell, G., Yakovlev, A.: `Statistical variability analysis of a mutual exclusion element for strained silicon processes', Workshop on the Impact of Process Variability on Design and Test, Design Automation and Test (DATE) Conf., 2008.
    11. 11)
      • (2006) Minitab release 15, statistical software.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • (2003) TSUPREM4 user's guide.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • D.C. Montgomery . (2001) Design and analysis of experiments.
    16. 16)
      • Nassif, S.R.: `Modeling and analysis of manufacturing variations', Proc. Custom Integrated Circuit Conf., 2001, p. 223–228.
    17. 17)
      • Cheng, B., Roy, S., Asenov, A.: `The impact of random doping effects on SRAM cell', European Solid State Circuits Conf. (ESSCIRC), 2004, p. 219–222.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Semiconductor Industry Association: ‘International Technology Road map for Semiconductors (ITRS)’, 2009,
    20. 20)
      • (2003) Two-dimensional device simulation program.
    21. 21)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address