Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Radial correlations in iris patterns, and mutual information within IrisCodes

Radial correlations in iris patterns, and mutual information within IrisCodes

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The discriminating powers of biometric patterns derive from their entropy, just as the hardness of cryptographic keys derive from their entropy. The larger the number of independent bits, or the more independent they are, the less chance of collision. The authors measured the mutual information entailed by radial correlations within each of 632,500 different iris patterns from persons of 152 nationalities. For each iris, they measured how well the sequence of bits in any ring of the IrisCode predicts the sequence of bits in the other rings. Information density is quite non-uniformly distributed across iris patterns radially. Their measurements of mutual information address how much radial resolution is productive to use when encoding an iris, and they show that a non-uniform allocation of encoding resolution radially leads to significant performance improvements by reducing redundancy.


    1. 1)
      • 5. Depeursinge, A., Al-Kadi, O., Mitchell, J.: ‘Biomedical texture analysis: fundamentals, applications, tools and challenges’ (Elsevier, London, UK, 2017).
    2. 2)
      • 3. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: ‘Textural features for image classification’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1973, 3, (6), pp. 610621.
    3. 3)
      • 9. Grother, P., Quinn, G.W., Matey, J.R., et al: ‘IREX-III: performance of iris identification algorithms’. NIST Interagency Report 7836, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 6 April 2012.
    4. 4)
      • 2. Wang, L., He, D.C.: ‘Texture classification using texture spectrum’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 1990, 13, pp. 905910.
    5. 5)
      • 8. Daugman, J.G.: ‘Information theory and the IrisCode’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., 2015, 11, (2), pp. 400409.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Zucker, S.W., Terzopoulos, D.: ‘Finding structure in co-occurrence matrices for texture analysis’, Comput. Graph. Image Process., 1980, 2, pp. 286308.
    7. 7)
      • 10. Daugman, J.G.: ‘How iris recognition works’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2004, 14, (1), pp. 2130.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Shannon, C.E.: ‘A mathematical theory of communication’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1948, 27, pp. 379423.
    9. 9)
      • 7. Cover, T., Thomas, J.: ‘Elements of information theory’ (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2006, 2nd edn.).
    10. 10)
      • 1. Hu, Y., Sirlantzis, K., Howells, G.: ‘A study on iris textural correlation using steering kernels’. IEEE 8th Int. Conf. on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS), Buffalo, New York, USA, 2016, pp. 18, doi: 10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791160.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address