Secure multimodal biometric system based on diffused graphs and optimal score fusion
- Author(s): Gurjit Singh Walia 1 ; Shivam Rishi 2 ; Rajesh Asthana 1 ; Aarohi Kumar 3 ; Anjana Gupta 4
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
Ministry of Defense , Defense Research and Development Organization , Delhi , India ;
2: Department of ECE , Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology , Dwarka , Delhi , India ;
3: Department of ECE , Punjab Engineering College , Chandigarh , Punjab , India ;
4: Department of Applied Mathematics , Delhi Technological University , Delhi , India
-
Affiliations:
1:
Ministry of Defense , Defense Research and Development Organization , Delhi , India ;
- Source:
Volume 8, Issue 4,
July
2019,
p.
231 – 242
DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5018 , Print ISSN 2047-4938, Online ISSN 2047-4946
- « Previous Article
- Table of contents
- Next Article »
Biometric authentication systems offer potential advantages over traditional knowledge-based methods. However, most of the biometric systems which are extensively used lack template security and robustness. In order to address these issues, in this study, the authors have proposed a multimodal biometric system based on the combination of multiple modalities and optimal score level fusion. In addition, key features are introduced for each modality for generating cancellable biometric features. Features from individual traits are combined with corresponding key features to provide feature transformation. A robust template is generated by diffusion of individual transformed matrices using graph-based random walk cross-diffusion. In addition, individual classifier score is optimally fused using proposed multistage score level fusion model. Optimal belief masses for individual classifier are determined using cuckoo search optimisation. Wherein, optimal classifier beliefs are fused using DSmT based proportional conflict redistribution (PCR-6) rules. Experimental results demonstrate that optimal score fusion applied on cross-diffused features produce better results than existing state-of-the-art multimodal fusion schemes. On average of the outcome, equal error rate and accuracy achieved using the proposed method on four chimeric benchmarked datasets, are 2.32 and 98.316%.
Inspec keywords: optimisation; biometrics (access control); knowledge based systems; graph theory; random processes; sensor fusion; search problems
Other keywords: diffused graphs; multimodal fusion schemes; graph-based random walk cross-diffusion; multistage score level fusion model; optimal score level fusion; biometric systems; cuckoo search optimisation; cross-diffused features; optimal classifier beliefs; DSmT based proportional conflict redistribution; knowledge-based methods; feature transformation; secure multimodal biometric system; biometric authentication systems
Subjects: Combinatorial mathematics; Sensor fusion; Expert systems and other AI software and techniques; Other topics in statistics; Data security; Optimisation techniques
References
-
-
1)
-
2. Lumini, A., Nanni, L.: ‘Overview of the combination of biometric matchers’, Inf. Fusion, 2017, 33, pp. 71–85.
-
-
2)
-
30. Beyer, K., Goldstein, J., Ramakrishnan, R., et al: ‘When is ‘nearest neighbor’ meaningful?’ Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999), 1540, pp. 217–235.
-
-
3)
-
19. Connie, T., Teoh, A., Goh, M., et al: ‘Palmhashing: a novel approach for cancelable biometrics’, Inf. Process. Lett., 2005, 93, (1), pp. 1–5.
-
-
4)
-
33. Martin, A., Osswald, C.: ‘A new generalization of the proportional conflict redistribution rule stable in terms of decision’, Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion: Collected Works Volume 2, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 69–88.
-
-
5)
-
4. Tome, P., Fierrez, J., Vera-Rodriguez, R., et al: ‘Identification using face regions: application and assessment in forensic scenarios’, Forensic Sci. Int., 2013, 233, (1-3), pp. 75–83.
-
-
6)
-
20. Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Wu, L., et al: ‘Unsupervised metric fusion over multiview data by graph random walk-based cross-view diffusion’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2017, 28, (1), pp. 57–70.
-
-
7)
-
1. Unar, J.A., Seng, W.C., Abbasi, A.: ‘A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects’, Pattern Recognit., 2014, 47, (8), pp. 2673–2688.
-
-
8)
-
13. Tong, T., Gray, K., Gao, Q., et al: ‘Multi-modal classification of Alzheimers disease using nonlinear graph fusion’, Pattern Recognit., 2017, 63, pp. 171–181.
-
-
9)
-
5. Huang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, X., et al: ‘An adaptive bimodal recognition framework using sparse coding for face and ear’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2015, 53, pp. 69–76.
-
-
10)
-
12. Srinivas, N., Veeramachaneni, K., Osadciw, L.A.: ‘Fusing correlated data from multiple classifiers for improved biometric verification’. 2009 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Seattle, WA, USA, 2009, pp. 1504–1511.
-
-
11)
-
27. Zhang, W., Shan, S., Gao, W., et al: ‘Local Gabor binary pattern histogram sequence (lgbphs): a novel non-statistical model for face representation and recognition’. 2005 IEEE Tenth IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV 2005), Beijing, China, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 786–791.
-
-
12)
-
21. Oussalah, M.: ‘On the use of hamachers t-norms family for information aggregation’, Inf. Sci., 2003, 153, pp. 107–154.
-
-
13)
-
7. Mezai, L., Hachouf, F.: ‘Score-level fusion of face and voice using particle swarm optimization and belief functions’, IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., 2015, 45, (6), pp. 761–772.
-
-
14)
-
39. Gonzalez, E.: ‘AMI ear dataset’. Accessed on 1 October 2017. Available at http://ctim.ulpgc.es/research_works/ami_ear_database/.
-
-
15)
-
34. Dezert, J., Smarandache, F.: ‘Proportional conflict redistribution rules for information fusion’, Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion-Collected Works, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 3–68.
-
-
16)
-
26. Daugman, J.G.: ‘High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1993, 15, (11), pp. 1148–1161.
-
-
17)
-
25. Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: ‘Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel’. Proc. of the 6th ACM Int. Conf. on Image and Video Retrieval, 2007, pp. 401–408.
-
-
18)
-
35. Denoeux, T., Masson, M.H.: ‘Dempster-Shafer reasoning in large partially ordered sets: applications in machine learning’, ‘integrated uncertainty management and applications’ (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 39–54.
-
-
19)
-
9. Conti, V., Militello, C., Sorbello, F., et al: ‘A frequency-based approach for features fusion in fingerprint and iris multimodal biometric identification systems’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 2010, 40, (4), pp. 384–395.
-
-
20)
-
31. Hall, P., Park, B.U., Samworth, R.J., et al: ‘Choice of neighbor order in nearest-neighbor classification’, Ann. Stat., 2008, 36, (5), pp. 2135–2152.
-
-
21)
-
29. Duff, I.S.: ‘A survey of sparse matrix research’, Proc. IEEE, 1977, 65, (4), pp. 500–535.
-
-
22)
-
44. Poh, N., Bengio, S.: ‘Why do multi-stream, multi-band and multi-modal approaches work on biometric user authentication tasks?’. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. on Proc. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'04), Montreal, Que., Canada, 2004, vol. 5, p. V-893.
-
-
23)
-
3. Lee, P.: ‘Prints charming: how fingerprints are trailblazing mainstream biometrics’, Biometric Technol. Today, 2017, 2017, (4), pp. 8–11.
-
-
24)
-
46. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: ‘Triangular norms. Position paper II: general constructions and parameterized families’, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2004, 145, (3), pp. 411–438.
-
-
25)
-
15. Ratha, N.K., Chikkerur, S., Connell, J.H., et al: ‘Generating cancelable fingerprint templates’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2007, 29, (4), pp. 561–572.
-
-
26)
-
18. Chin, C.S., Jin, A.T.B., Ling, D.N.C.: ‘High security iris verification system based on random secret integration’, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2006, 102, (2), pp. 169–177.
-
-
27)
-
23. Canuto, A.M.P., Pintro, F., Xavier-Junior, J.C.: ‘Investigating fusion approaches in multi-biometric cancellable recognition’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2013, 40, (6), pp. 1971–1980.
-
-
28)
-
28. Liberti, L., Lavor, C., Maculan, N., et al: ‘Euclidean distance geometry and applications’, SIAM Rev., 2014, 56, (1), pp. 3–69.
-
-
29)
-
38. Spacek, D.L.: ‘Computer vision science research projects’. Accessed on 10 October 2018. Available at: http://cswww.essex.ac.uk/mv/allfaces/.
-
-
30)
-
43. Daugman, J.: ‘Biometric decision landscapes’ (University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
-
-
31)
-
14. Jain, A.K., Nandakumar, K., Nagar, A.: ‘Biometric template security’, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 2008, 2008, p. 113.
-
-
32)
-
6. Huang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, C., et al: ‘A robust face and ear based multimodal biometric system using sparse representation’, Pattern Recognit., 2013, 46, (8), pp. 2156–2168.
-
-
33)
-
42. Kumar, A., Wu, C.: ‘Automated human identification using ear imaging’, Pattern Recognit., 2012, 45, (3), pp. 956–968.
-
-
34)
-
17. Savvides, M., Kumar, B.V., Khosla, P.K.: ‘Cancelable biometric filters for face recognition’. IEEE Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004), Cambridge, UK, 2004, vol. 3, pp. 922–925.
-
-
35)
-
11. Fierrez-Aguilar, J., Ortega-Garcia, J., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., et al: ‘Discriminative multimodal biometric authentication based on quality measures’, Pattern Recognit., 2005, 38, (5), pp. 777–779.
-
-
36)
-
10. Alsaade, F., Ariyaeeinia, A., Malegaonkar, A., et al: ‘Qualitative fusion of normalised scores in multimodal biometrics’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2009, 30, (5), pp. 564–569.
-
-
37)
-
32. Yang, X.S., Deb, S.: ‘Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search’, arXiv preprint arXiv:10052908, 2010.
-
-
38)
-
24. de Paula-Canuto, A.M., Pintro, F., Fairhurst, M.C.: ‘Ensemble systems and cancellable transformations for multibiometric-based identification’, IET Biometrics, 2014, 3, (1), pp. 29–40.
-
-
39)
-
16. Teoh, A.B.J., Goh, A., Ngo, D.C.L.: ‘Random multispace quantization as an analytic mechanism for BioHashing of biometric and random identity inputs’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2006, 28, (12), pp. 1892–1901.
-
-
40)
-
41. Kumar, A., Passi, A.: ‘Comparison and combination of iris matchers for reliable personal authentication’, Pattern Recognit., 2010, 43, (3), pp. 1016–1026.
-
-
41)
-
8. Raghavendra, R., Dorizzi, B., Rao, A., et al: ‘Designing efficient fusion schemes for multimodal biometric systems using face and palmprint’, Pattern Recognit., 2011, 44, (5), pp. 1076–1088.
-
-
42)
-
22. Walia, G.S., Singh, T., Singh, K., et al: ‘Robust multimodal biometric system based on optimal score level fusion model’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2018, 116, pp. 364–376.
-
-
43)
-
36. Veeramachaneni, K., Osadciw, L.A., Varshney, P.K.: ‘An adaptive multimodal biometric management algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 2005, 35, (3), pp. 344–356.
-
-
44)
-
37. Samaria, F.S., Harter, A.C.: ‘Parameterisation of a stochastic model for human face identification’. 1994 Proc. of the Second IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, Sarasota, FL, USA, 1994, pp. 138–142.
-
-
45)
-
45. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., et al: ‘On combining classifiers’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1998, 20, (3), pp. 226–239.
-
-
46)
-
40. ‘Casia-irisv1’. Accessed on 10 October 2017. Available at http://biometrics.idealtest.org.
-
-
1)