Self-geometric relationship filter for efficient SIFT key-points matching in full and partial palmprint recognition

Self-geometric relationship filter for efficient SIFT key-points matching in full and partial palmprint recognition

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Recently, palmprints have been broadly reported in the literature as an effective biometric modality. Although scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)-based features have been proven to be robust against image transformations and deformations, SIFT has not been as successful as other methods in palmprint recognition. In fact, SIFT-based identification has been widely criticised in biometrics due to its high false matching rate. To overcome this weakness, a new filtering method for SIFT-based palmprint matching, called the self-geometric relationship-based filter (SGR-filter) is presented. While existing SIFT matching considers only the relationship between the SIFT points of the query image, on one hand, and their corresponding points in the reference image, on the other hand, SGR-filtering further takes into account the geometric relationship between SIFT points within the query image in comparison with the relationship of the corresponding matched points in the reference image. Assessed with the proposed SGR-filter on various datasets, the SIFT-based palmprint recognition system has been shown to deliver significantly higher performance when compared with the conventional SIFT matching as well as another related key-points filtering technique. Furthermore, experimental results on a number of different full and partial palmprint datasets have shown the superiority of the proposed system over state-of-the-art techniques.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Zhang, D.: ‘Palmprint authentication’ (Springer Science & Business Media, USA, 2004).
    2. 2)
      • 2. Kong, A., Zhang, D., Kamel, M.: ‘Palmprint identification using feature-level fusion’, Pattern Recognit., 2006, 39, pp. 478487.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Zhang, D., Kong, W., You, J., et al: ‘Online palmprint identification’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2003, 25, pp. 10411050.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Sun, Z., Tan, T., Wang, Y., et al: ‘Ordinal palmprint represention for personal identification [represention read representation]’. 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), San Diego, CA, USA, 1 June 2005, pp. 279284.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Wu, X., Wang, K., Zhang, D.: ‘Wavelet based palm print recognition’. Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Beijing, China, November 2002, pp. 12531257.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Kong, A.W.K., Zhang, D.: ‘Competitive coding scheme for palmprint verification’. Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, 2004 (ICPR 2004), Cambridge, UK, August 2004, vol. 1, pp. 520523.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Jia, W., Huang, -S., Zhang, D.: ‘Palmprint verification based on robust line orientation code’, Pattern Recognit., 2008, 41, pp. 15041513.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Jia, W., Hu, R. X., Lei, Y. K., et al: ‘Histogram of oriented lines for palmprint recognition’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Syst., 2014, 44, pp. 385395.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Zheng, Q., Kumar, A., Pan, G.: ‘Suspecting less and doing better: new insights on palmprint identification for faster and more accurate matching’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Sec., 2016, 11, pp. 633641.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Bounneche, M. D., Boubchir, L., Ali-Chérif, A., et al: ‘2D log-Gabor filters for competitive coding-based multi-spectral palmprint recognition’. 2016 39th Int. Conf. Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), Vienna, Austria, June 2016, pp. 677680.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Fei, L., Zhang, B., Xu, Y., et al: ‘Palmprint recognition using neighboring direction indicator’, IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst., 2016, 46, pp. 787798.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Luo, -T., Zhao, -Y., Zhang, B., et al: ‘Local line directional pattern for palmprint recognition’, Pattern Recognit., 2016, 50, pp. 2644.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Zhang, L., Li, L., Yang, A., et al: ‘Towards contactless palmprint recognition: a novel device, a new benchmark, and a collaborative representation based identification approach’, Pattern Recognit., 2017, 69, pp. 199212.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lowe, D. G.: ‘Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2004, 60, pp. 91110.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Morales, A., Ferrer, M. A., Kumar, A.: ‘Towards contactless palmprint authentication’, IET Comput. Vis., 2011, 5, pp. 407416.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Chen, J., Moon, S.: ‘Using SIFT features in palmprint authentication’. 2008 19th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, Tampa, FL, USA, December 2008.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Badrinath, G. S., Nigam, A., Phalguni, G.: ‘An efficient finger-knuckle-print based recognition system fusing SIFT and SURF matching scores’. Proc. Information and Communications Security: 13th Int. Conf. (ICICS 2011), Beijing, China, November 2011.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Esther, P., Shanmugalakshmi, R.: ‘A multimodal biometric system based on palmprint and finger knuckle print recognition methods’, Int. Arab Journal of Information Technology (IAJIT), 2015, 12, pp. 118128.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Nibouche, O., Jiang, J.: ‘Palmprint matching using feature points and SVD factorisation’, Digit. Signal Process., 2013, 23, pp. 11541162.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Wu, X., Zhao, Q., Bu, W.: ‘A SIFT-based contactless palmprint verification approach using iterative RANSAC and local palmprint descriptors’, Pattern Recognit., 2014, 47, pp. 33143326.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Fischler, M. A., Bolles, R. C.: ‘Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography’. Communications of the ACM, New York, NY, USA, June 1981, vol. 24, pp. 381395.
    22. 22)
      • 22. IIT delhi Touchless Palmprint Database version 1.0’. Available at:, accessed in January 2016.
    23. 23)
      • 23. ‘PolyU Palmprint Database’. Available at:, accessed in January 2016.
    24. 24)
      • 24. ‘Tsinghua 500PPI Palmprint Database (THUPALMLAB)’. Available at:, accessed in January 2016.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Kong, J., Lu, Y., Wang, S., et al: ‘A two stage neural network-based personal identification system using handprint’, Neurocomputing, 2008, 71, pp. 641647.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Alamghtuf, J., Khelifi, F.: ‘Self geometric relationship-based matching for palmprint identification using SIFT’. 2017 5th Int. Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF), Coventry, UK, April 2017, pp. 15.
    27. 27)
      • 27. ‘PolyU multispectral Palmprint Database’. Available at:, accessed in January 2016.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Vedaldi, A.: ‘Implementation of SIFT keypoints detector’. Available at:, accessed in January 2016.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address