Introducing an approach for writer recognition based on the i -vector paradigm

Introducing an approach for writer recognition based on the i -vector paradigm

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

An off-line text-independent writer verification system that leverages the similarities with the field of speaker recognition by employing analogous techniques for modelling and comparing the features extracted from the input text images is presented. The main contribution of this work is the use of the i -vector paradigm in a writer verification setting. The proposed system is evaluated with images of lines of text from the IAM Handwriting Database, and compared with more traditional approaches. The authors also analyse several algorithms for the detection and extraction of points of interest in the text images, different parameters for the modelling part and different scoring techniques. The obtained results show that the use of i -vectors clearly improves the performance of the system even for configurations where the overhead of the additional calculations is minimal.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Srihari, S.N., Leedham, G.: ‘A survey of computer methods in forensic document examination’. Proceedings of 11th Conference International on Graphonomics Society (IGS2003), 2003, pp. 278281.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Plamondon, R., Lorette, G.: ‘Automatic signature verification and writer identification–the state of the art’, Pattern Recogn., 1989, 22, (2), pp. 107131.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Said, H., Tan, T., Baker, K.: ‘Personal identification based on handwriting’, Pattern Recogn., 2000, 33, (1), pp. 149160.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Bertolini, D., Oliveira, L.S., Justino, E., et al: ‘Texture-based descriptors for writer identification and verification’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2013, 40, (6), pp. 20692080.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Okawa, M., Yoshida, K.: ‘Text and user generic model for writer verification using combined pen pressure information from ink intensity and indented writing on paper’, IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., 2015, 45, (3), pp. 339349.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Hannad, Y., Siddiqi, I., Kettani, M.E.Y.E.: ‘Writer identification using texture descriptors of handwritten fragments’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2016, 47, pp. 1422.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Bulacu, M., Schomaker, L.: ‘Text-independent writer identification and verification using textural and allographic features’, Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., IEEE Trans., 2007, 29, (4), pp. 701717.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Siddiqi, I., Vincent, N.: ‘Text independent writer recognition using redundant writing patterns with contour-based orientation and curvature features’, Pattern Recogn., 2010, 43, (11), pp. 38533865.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Wu, X., Tang, Y., Bu, W.: ‘Offline text-independent writer identification based on scale invariant feature transform’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, 2014, 9, (3), pp. 526536.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Lowe, D.G.: ‘Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints’, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 2004, 60, (2), pp. 91110.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., et al: ‘Speeded-up robust features (SURF)’, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2008, 110, (3), pp. 346359.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Davis, S., Mermelstein, P.: ‘Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences’, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., , 1980, 28, (4), pp. 357366.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Reynolds, D.A., Quatieri, T.F., Dunn, R.B.: ‘Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models’, Digit. Signal Process., 2000, 10, 1-3, pp. 1941, (
    14. 14)
      • 14. Schlapbach, A., Bunke, H.: ‘Off-line writer identification using Gaussian mixture models’. Pattern Recognition, 2006. ICPR 2006. 18th Int. Conf. on, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 992995.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Glembek, O., Burget, L., Matejka, P., et al: ‘Simplification and optimization of i-vector extraction’. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011 IEEE International Conf. on, May 2011, pp. 45164519.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Kenny, P., Boulianne, G., Ouellet, P., et al: ‘Joint factor analysis versus eigenchannels in speaker recognition’, IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang Process., 2007, 15, (4), pp. 14351447.
    17. 17)
      • 17. ‘OpenCV (Open Source Computer Vision library)’,
    18. 18)
      • 18. Bonastre, J.-F., Wils, F., Meignier, S.: ‘ALIZE, a free toolkit for speaker recognition’. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP ‘05). IEEE International Conf. on, March 2005, vol. 1, pp. 737740.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Marti, U.-V., Bunke, H.: ‘The IAM-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition’, Int. J. Document Anal. Recogn., 2002, 5, (1), pp. 3946. doix: 10.1007/s100320200071.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Harris, C., Stephens, M.: ‘A combined corner and edge detector’. Proc. of Fourth Alvey Vision Conf., 1988, pp. 147151.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Shi, J., Tomasi, C.: ‘Good features to track’. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1994. Proc. CVPR ‘94., 1994 IEEE Computer Society Conf. on, June 1994, pp. 593600.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Larcher, A., Lee, K.A., Ma, B., et al: ‘Phonetically-constrained PLDA modeling for text-dependent speaker verification with multiple short utterances’. 2013 IEEE International Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 2013, pp. 76737677.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., et al: ‘ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF’. Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conf. on, November 2011, pp. 25642571.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., Siegwart, R.: ‘BRISK: binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints’. Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conf. on, November 2011, pp. 25482555.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Alahi, A., Ortiz, R., Vandergheynst, P.: ‘FREAK: fast retina keypoint’. ComputerVision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conf. on, June 2012, pp. 510517.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address