Modelling errors in a biometric re-identification system

Modelling errors in a biometric re-identification system

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors consider the problem of ‘re-identification’ where a biometric system answers the question ‘Has this person been encountered before?’ without actually deducing the person's identity. Such a system is vital in biometric surveillance applications and applicable to biometric de-duplication. In such a system, identifiers are created dynamically as and when the system encounters an input probe. Consequently, multiple probes of the same identity may be mistakenly assigned different identifiers, whereas probes from different identities may be mistakenly assigned the same identifier. In this study, they describe a re-identification system and develop terminology as well as mathematical expressions for prediction of matching errors. Furthermore, they demonstrate that the sequential order in which the probes are encountered by the system has a great impact on its matching performance. Experimental analysis based on unimodal and multimodal faces and fingerprint scores confirms the validity of the designed error prediction model, as well as demonstrates that traditional metrics for biometric recognition fail to accurately characterise the error dynamics of a re-identification system.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Jain, A., Bolle, R., Pankanti, S.: ‘Biometrics: personal identification in networked society’ (Heidelberg, 1999).
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 3. Gheissari, N., Sebastian, T., Hartley, R.: ‘Person reidentification using spatiotemporal appearance’. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 15281535.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Hamdoun, O., Moutarde, F., Stanciulescu, B., et al: ‘Person re-identification in multi-camera system by signature based on interest point descriptors collected on short video sequences’. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICSDC), 2008, pp. 16.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Martinel, N., Micheloni, C.: ‘Re-identify people in wide area camera network’. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 3136.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 8. Charikar, M., Chekuri, C., Feder, T., et al: ‘Incremental clustering and dynamic information retrieval’. Proc. 29th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1997, pp. 626635.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Liu, D., Kubala, F.: ‘Online speaker clustering’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 11. Hampapur, A., Brown, L., Connell, H., et al: ‘Smart video surveillance: exploring the concept of multi-scale tracking’. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, March 2005, pp. 3851.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 13. Jain, A., Kopell, D., Kakligian, K., et al: ‘Using stationary-dynamic camera assemblies for wide-area video surveillance and selective attention’. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2006.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Barr, J., Bowyer, K., Flynn, P.: ‘Detecting questionable observers using face track clustering’. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2011.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Phillips, P., Flynn, P., Scruggs, T., et al: ‘Overview of the Face recognition grand challenge’. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Jain, A., Flynn, P., Ross, A.: ‘Handbook of biometrics’ (Springer, 2008).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Mansfield, A., Wayman, J.: ‘Best practices in testing and reporting performance of biometric devices’ (UK Govt. Biometrics Working Group, 2002).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Wayman, J., Jain, A., Maltoni, D., et al: ‘Biometric systems: technology design and performance evaluation’ (Springer-Verlag, 2005).
    19. 19)
      • 19. Hong, L., Jain, A., Pankanti, S.: ‘Can multibiometrics improve performance?’. Proc. of AutoID, Summit, NJ, USA, October 1999, pp. 5964.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Ross, A., Nandakumar, K., Jain, A.K.: ‘Handbook of multibiometrics’ (Springer, 2006).
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 22. Doddington, G., Liggett, W., Martin, A., et al: ‘Sheep, goats, lambs and wolves: a statistical analysis of speaker performance’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Language and Speech Processing, 1998, pp. 13511354.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Ross, A., Rattani, A., Tistarelli, M.: ‘Exploiting the Doddington zoo effect in biometric fusion’. Third IEEE Int. Conf. on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS), 2009, pp. 17.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Crihalmeanu, S., Ross, A., Schuckers, S., et al: ‘A protocol for multibiometric data acquisition, storage and dissemination’ (West Virginia University, 2007).
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 27. Grother, P., Quinn, G., Phillips, P.: ‘Report on the evaluation of 2d still-image face recognition algorithms’ (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2010).
    28. 28)
      • 28. Grother, P., Quinn, G.W., Matey, J.R., et al: ‘IREX III performance of iris identification algorithms’ (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2012).
    29. 29)
      • 29. Wayman, J., Possolo, A., Mansfield, A.: ‘Fundamental issues in biometric performance testing: a modern statistical and philosophical framework for uncertainty assessment’. First Int. Biometric Performance Conf. (IBPC), 2010.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 31. DeCann, B., Ross, A.: ‘Has this person been encountered before?: modeling an anonymous identification system’. IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Biometrics at the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Conf., 2012.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address