Your browser does not support JavaScript!

access icon free Effects of pose and image resolution on automatic face recognition

The popularity of face recognition systems have increased due to their use in widespread applications. Driven by the enormous number of potential application domains, several algorithms have been proposed for face recognition. Face pose and image resolutions are among the two important factors that influence the performance of face recognition algorithms. In this study, the authors present a comparative study of three baseline face recognition algorithms to analyse the effects of two aforementioned factors. The algorithms studied include (a) the adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) with linear discriminant analysis as weak learner, (b) the principal component analysis (PCA)-based approach, and (c) the local binary pattern (LBP)-based approach. They perform an empirical study using the images with systematic pose variation and resolution from multi-pose, illumination, and expression database to explore the recognition accuracy. This evaluation is useful for practical applications because most engineers start development of a face recognition application using these baseline algorithms. Simulation results revealed that the PCA is more accurate in classifying the pose variation, whereas the AdaBoost is more robust in identifying low-resolution images. The LBP does not classify face images of size 20 × 20 pixels and below and has lower recognition accuracy than PCA and AdaBoost.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 10. Yaniv, T., Ming, Y., Marc, R., et al: ‘Closing gap to human level performance in face verification’. Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013, pp. 18.
    3. 3)
      • 11. Huang, G., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., et al: ‘Labeled faces in the wild: a database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments’. Technical Report, 07–49, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 2007.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 30. Junlin, H., Jiwen, L., Yap, T.: ‘Discriminative deep metric learning for face verification in the wild’. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014, pp. 18751882.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 23. Mahmood, Z., Ali, T., Khattak, S.: ‘Automatic player detection and recognition in images using AdaBoost’. Ninth Int. Bhurban Conf. on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), February 2012, pp. 6469.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 21. Shu, L., Albert, C.: ‘A novel Markov random field based deformable model for face recognition’. CVPR, 2010, pp. 26752682.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 15. Phillips, P.J., Flynn, P.J., Scruggs, T., et al: ‘Overview of the face recognition grand challenge’, Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2005, (1), pp. 947954.
    21. 21)
      • 8. The BJUT-3D large-scale Chinese face database. Available at MISKL-TR-05-FM FR-001.pdf.
    22. 22)
      • 18. Mahmood, Z., Ali, T., Khattak, S., et al: ‘Automatic player detection and identification for sports entertainment applications’, Pattern Anal. Appl., 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10044-014-0416-4.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 24. Bishop, C.M.: ‘Pattern recognition and machine leaning’ (Springer, New York, 2006), (1).
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 33. Zhen, C., Wen, L., Dong, X., et al: ‘Fusing robust face region descriptors via multiple metric learning for face recognition in the wild’. Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013, pp. 35543561.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 12. Sun, Y., Xiaogang, W., Xiaoou, T.: ‘Deep learning face representation from predicting 10,000 classes’. Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013, pp. 18.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 17. Yang, A., Zhou, Z.: ‘Fast l-1-minimization algorithms for robust face recognition’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2013, 8, (22), pp. 15981603.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address