Shape primitive histogram: low-level face representation for face recognition

Shape primitive histogram: low-level face representation for face recognition

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Human face contains abundant shape features. This fact motivates a lot of shape feature-based face detection and three-dimensional (3D) face recognition approaches. However, as far as we know, there is no prior low-level face representation which is purely based on shape feature proposed for conventional 2D (image-based) face recognition. In this study, the authors present a novel low-level shape-based face representation named ‘shape primitives histogram’ (SPH) for face recognition. In this approach, the face images are separated into a number of tiny shape fragments and they reduce these shape fragments to several uniform atomic shape patterns called ‘shape primitives’. Then the face representation is obtained by implementing a histogram statistic of shape primitives in a local image region. To take scale information into consideration, they also produce multi-scale SPHs (MSPHs) by concatenating the SPHs extracted from different scales. Moreover, they experimentally study the influences of each stage of SPH computation on performance, concluding that a small cell with 1/2 overlap and a fine size block with 1/2 overlap are important for good results. Four popular face databases, namely ORL, AR, YaleB and LFW-a, are employed to evaluate SPH and MSPH. Surprisingly, such seemingly naive shape-based face representations outperform the state-of-the-art low-level face representations.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 3. He, X., Niyogi, P.: ‘Locality preserving projections’. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2003.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 5. Sheng, H., Elgammal, A., Huangfu, L., Yang, D., Zhang, X.: ‘Globality-locality preserving projections for biometric data dimensionality reduction’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop on Biometrics (CVPRW), 2014.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Huang, S., Yang, D., Ge, Y., Zhao, D., Feng, X.: ‘Discriminant hyper-Laplacian projections with its applications to face recognition’. IEEE Conf. on Multimedia and Expo Workshop on HIM (ICMEW), 2014.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 12. Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: ‘Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005, pp. 886893.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 17. Cao, Z., Yin, Q., Tang, X., Sun, J.: ‘Face recognition with learning-based descriptor’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010, pp. 27072714.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 24. Lienhart, R., Maydt, J.: ‘An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP), 2002, pp. 900903.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 26. Viola, P.A., Jones, M.J.: ‘Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2001, pp. 511518.
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 31. Samaria, F.S., Harter, A.C.: ‘Parameterisation of a stochastic model for human face identification’, Applications of Computer Vision, 1994, pp. 138142.
    32. 32)
      • 32. Martínez, A., Benavente, R.: ‘The ar face database’, June 1998.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 34. Wolf, L., Hassner, T., Taigman, Y.: ‘Similarity scores based on background samples’. Asian Conf. on Computer Vision (ACCV), Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 8897.
    35. 35)
      • 35. Zhang, D., Yang, M., Feng, X.: ‘Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011, pp. 471478.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • 38. Yang, M., Zhang, D., Wang, S.: ‘Relaxed collaborative representation for pattern classification’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 22242231.
    39. 39)
      • 39. Zhong, L., Liu, Q., Yang, P., Liu, B., Huang, J., Metaxas, D.N.: ‘Learning active facial patches for expression analysis’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 25622569.
    40. 40)
      • 40. Yu, X., Huang, J., Zhang, S., Yan, W., Metaxas, D.N.: ‘Pose-free facial landmark fitting via optimized part mixtures and cascaded deformable shape model’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013.
    41. 41)
      • 41. Cui, Z., Li, W., Xu, D., Shan, S., Chen, X.: ‘Fusing robust face region descriptors via multiple metric learning for face recognition in the wild’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013, pp. 35543561.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address