Framework for managing ageing effects in signature biometrics

Framework for managing ageing effects in signature biometrics

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Biometrics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This paper investigates and explores the impact of physical ageing in signature biometrics. Experimental performance evaluation, using three different signature databases, is carried out to provide some new insights into the relationship between different practical factors, in particular clarifying the impact on recognition performance of the data collection protocols used and the use of the feature pools underpinning the signature processing. This analysis provides an alternative perspective from which to explore and manage physical ageing effects in signature biometrics. The paper demonstrates that the proposed strategy maximises system accuracy while minimising the performance differential across a population which is heterogeneous with respect to age, and across different databases. The results presented suggest that adoption of the strategy proposed can render a template update procedure less critical than hitherto expected.


    1. 1)
      • Biosecure: Biometrics for Secure Authentication, FP6 NoE, IST-2002-507634, available at, 2004.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • , : `The repeatability of signatures', 2004 IWFHR-9 2004 Ninth Int. Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, 26–29 October 2004.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • , : `Impact of time variability in off-line writer identification and verification', Proc. Sixth Int. Symp. on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 2009, ISPA 2009, 16–18 September 2009.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • , : `Analyzing the impact of non-biometric information on multiclassifier processing for signature recognition applications', Second IEEE Int. Conf. on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, 2008, BTAS 2008, 29 September–1 October 2008.
    11. 11)
      • J. Ortega-Garcia , J. Fierrez , F. Alonso-Fernandez . The multiscenario multienvironment biosecure multimodal database (BMDB). Pattern analysis and machine intelligence. IEEE Trans. , 6 , 1097 - 1111
    12. 12)
      • M. Abreu , M. Fairhurst , J. Fierrez , J. Ortega-Garcia , A. Esposito , A. Drygajlo , M. Faundez-Zanuy . (2009) Improving identity prediction in signature-based unimodal systems using soft biometrics, Biometric ID management and multimodal communication.
    13. 13)
      • Fairhurst, M., Abreu, M.: `An investigation of predictive profiling from handwritten signature data', Tenth Int. Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, 2009, ICDAR '09, 2009.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • H. Chih-Wei , L. Chih-Jen . A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. Neural networks. IEEE Trans. , 2 , 415 - 425
    21. 21)
      • , : `Quality analysis of dynamic signature based on the sigma-lognormal model', 2011 Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 18–21 September 2011.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address