access icon openaccess Comparative characterisation of conventional and textured 11 kV insulators using the rotating wheel dip test

This is an open access article published by the IET and CEPRI under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Received 26/07/2019, Accepted 26/04/2020, Revised 14/04/2020, Published 27/04/2020

Surface tracking and erosion is an irreversible degradation occurring on the insulator surface, and this can ultimately lead to failure of the insulator. Polymeric materials such as silicone rubber have many advantages; including a superior hydrophobic surface. However, polymers are exposed to ageing and degradation resulting from electrical and environmental stresses. The rotating wheel dip test is adopted to conduct a comparative study of surface conduction on the two insulators. A conventional design has been selected and compared with insulators having textured surface. Monitoring of the shed surface and insulator trunk using an IR camera were carried out to assess the temperature distribution along insulator profiles. A spatial analysis was also performed to identify key features of the two designs. Localised surface conductance measurements are proposed in this study. This helps to understand and distinguish the trends of conductance and its distribution on each surface, helping to predict the future surface degradation associated to each design.

Inspec keywords: ageing; failure analysis; silicone rubber insulators; infrared imaging; temperature distribution; hydrophobicity; electric admittance measurement; polymer insulators; environmental factors; insulator testing; silicone rubber

Other keywords: electrical stress; surface tracking; polymeric materials; future surface degradation prediction; environmental stress; silicon rubber; textured insulators; hydrophobic surface; insulator failure; voltage 11.0 kV; temperature distribution; feature identification; localised surface conductance measurements; insulator profiles; irreversible degradation; insulator surface; erosion; ageing; surface conduction; insulator trunk; shed surface monitoring; IR camera; rotating wheel dip test; comparative characterisation

Subjects: Thermal variables measurement; Organic insulation; Reliability; Power line supports, insulators and connectors; Impedance and admittance measurement

References

    1. 1)
      • 23. Reading and writing TDMS files with NI LabVIEW. Available at http://www.ni.com/white-paper/3727/en/#toc3, accessed 25 February 2019.
    2. 2)
      • 27. IEC 60507: ‘Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage ceramic and glass insulators to be used on a.c. systems’, 3rd edition, 2013.
    3. 3)
      • 1. Hackam, R.: ‘Outdoor HV composite polymeric insulators’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 1999, 6, (5), pp. 557–585.
    4. 4)
      • 5. Cheng, L., Shao, S., Zhang, S., et al: ‘Research on the long-time operation performance of composite insulator shed hydrophobicity under hydrothermal conditions’, IET High Volt., 2017, 3, (1), pp. 67–72.
    5. 5)
      • 25. Heger, G., Vermeulen, H., Holtzhausen, J.: ‘A comparative study of insulator materials exposed to high voltage AC and DC surface discharges’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2010, 17, (2), pp. 513–520.
    6. 6)
      • 20. ‘LabVIEW user manual’ (April 2003 Edition).
    7. 7)
      • 9. Klüss, J.V., Hamilton, J.: ‘Design of rotating wheel dip test system for standard tracking and erosion testing of polymeric insulators’. The 20th Int. Symp. on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 2017.
    8. 8)
      • 26. Krzma, A.S., Albano, M., Waters, R.T., et al: ‘Comparative performance of 11 kV silicone rubber polymeric insulators with HVAC and HVDC excitations using the rotating wheel dip test’. The 19th Int. Symp. on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), Pilsen, Czech Republic, 2015.
    9. 9)
      • 21. Krzma, A.: ‘Comparative laboratory performance characterisation of silicone rubber textured insulators’. PhD thesis, Cardiff University, 2016.
    10. 10)
      • 16. Wacker Chemie AG. Available at http://www.wacker.com, accessed June 2019.
    11. 11)
      • 13. Verma, A.R., Subba, R.B.: ‘Understanding surface degradation on polymeric insulators using rotating wheel and dip test under DC stress’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2018, 25, (5), pp. 2029–2037.
    12. 12)
      • 10. Chakraborty, R., Subba Reddy, B.: ‘Studies on high temperature vulcanized silicone rubber insulators under arid climatic aging’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2017, 24, (3), pp. 1751–1760.
    13. 13)
      • 24. Grasaesom, J., Thaong-om, S., Payakcho, W., et al: ‘Ageing deterioration of silicone rubber polymer insulator under salt water dip wheel test’, J. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2011, 56, pp. 211–217.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Reynders, J.P., Jandrell, I.R., Reynders, S.M.: ‘Review of aging and recovery of silicone rubber insulation for outdoor use’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 1999, 6, (5), pp. 620–631.
    15. 15)
      • 22. RS components: ‘AEDB-9140 Series Data Sheet’, January 2010.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Barsch, R., Jahn, H., Lambrecht, J., et al: ‘Test methods for polymeric insulating materials for outdoor HV insulation’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 1999, 6, (5), pp. 668–675.
    17. 17)
      • 12. Li, S., Liang, X., Liu, Y., et al: ‘Investigation on tracking wheel test of large-diameter composite insulators under AC voltage’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2017, 24, (6), pp. 3522–3529.
    18. 18)
      • 29. Waters, R.T., Haddad, A., Griffiths, H, et al: ‘Dry-band discharges on polluted silicone rubber insulation: control and characterization’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2011, 18, (6), pp. 1995–2003.
    19. 19)
      • 28. Marungsri, B., Shinokubo, H., Matsuoka, R.: ‘Effect of specimen configuration on deterioration of silicone rubber for polymer insulators in slat fog aging test’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2006, 13, (2), pp. 129–138.
    20. 20)
      • 17. Charalampidis, P.: ‘Characterisation of textured insulators for overhead lines and substations’. PhD thesis, Cardiff University, 2012.
    21. 21)
      • 8. Albano, M., Krzma, A.S., Waters, R.T., et al: ‘Artificial pollution layer characterization on conventional and textured silicone-rubber insulators’. The 19th Int. Symp. on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), Pilsen, Czech Republic, 2015.
    22. 22)
      • 15. Haddad, A., Waters, R.: ‘Insulating structures’. UK Patent 2406225, 2003.
    23. 23)
      • 4. Gubanski, S.M., Dernfalk, A., Andersson, J., et al: ‘Diagnostic methods for outdoor polymeric insulators’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2007, 14, (5), pp. 1065–1080.
    24. 24)
      • 19. Muncivi, A., Sarkar, P., Haddad, A.: ‘Tracking wheel test facilities’. 44th Int. Universities Power Engineering Conf., Glasgow, UK, 2009, pp. 1–5.
    25. 25)
      • 7. Krzma, A.S., Albano, M., Haddad, A.: ‘Flashover influence of fog rate on the characteristics of polluted silicone-rubber insulators’. 52nd Int. Universities Power Engineering Conf. (UPEC), Heraklion, Greece, December 2017, pp. 1–5.
    26. 26)
      • 14. Haddad, A., Waters, R., Griffiths, H., et al: ‘A new approach to anti-fog design for polymeric insulators’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2010, 17, (2), pp. 343–350.
    27. 27)
      • 6. Chakraborty, R., Reddy, S.B.: ‘Performance of silicone rubber insulators under thermal and electrical stress’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2017, 53, (3), pp. 2446–2454.
    28. 28)
      • 18. IEC 62730: ‘HV polymeric insulators for indoor and outdoor use tracking and erosion testing by wheel test and 5 000h test’, 2012.
    29. 29)
      • 2. Kikuchi, T., Nishimura, S., Nagao, M., et al: ‘Survey on the use of non-ceramic composite insulators’, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 1999, 6, (5), pp. 548–556.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/hve.2019.0189
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/hve.2019.0189
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading