This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Retinal degenerative diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa, begin with damage to the photoreceptor layer of the retina. In the absence of presynaptic input from photoreceptors, networks of electrically coupled AII amacrine and cone bipolar cells have been observed to exhibit oscillatory behaviour and result in spontaneous firing of ganglion cells. This ganglion cell activity could interfere with external stimuli provided by retinal prosthetic devices and potentially degrade their performance. In this work, the authors computationally investigate stimulus waveform designs, which can improve the performance of retinal prostheses by suppressing undesired spontaneous firing of ganglion cells and generating precise temporal spiking patterns. They utilise a multi-scale computational model for electrical stimulation of degenerated retina based on the admittance method and NEURON simulation environments. They present a class of asymmetric biphasic pulses that can generate precise ganglion cell firing patterns with up to 55% lower current requirements compared to traditional symmetric biphasic pulses. This lower current results in activation of only proximal ganglion cells, provides more focused stimulation and lowers the risk of tissue damage.
References
-
-
1)
-
28. Loizos, K., RamRakhyani, A.K., Anderson, J., et al: ‘On the computation of a retina resistivity profile for applications in multi-scale modeling of electrical stimulation and absorption’, Phys. Med. Biol., 2016, 61, (12), pp. 4491–4505 (doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4491).
-
2)
-
19. Freeman, D.K., Eddington, D.K., Rizzo, J.F., et al: ‘Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation’, J. Neurophysiol., 2010, 104, (5), pp. 2778–2791 (doi: 10.1152/jn.00551.2010).
-
3)
-
3. Ahuja, A.K., Yeoh, J., Dorn, J.D., et al: ‘Factors affecting perceptual threshold in argus II retinal prosthesis subjects’, Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol., 2013, 2, (4), pp. 1–15 (doi: 10.1167/tvst.2.4.1).
-
4)
-
23. Im, M., Werginz, P., Fried, S.I.: ‘Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type’, J. Neural Eng., 2018, 15, (3), pp. 1–15 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaadc1).
-
5)
-
26. Loizos, K., Marc, R., Humayun, M., et al: ‘Increasing electrical stimulation efficacy in degenerated retina: stimulus waveform design in a multiscale computational model’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2018, 26, (6), pp. 1111–1120 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2832055).
-
6)
-
4. Mills, J.O., Jalil, A., Stanga, P.E.: ‘Electronic retinal implants and artificial vision: journey and present’, Eye, 2017, 31, (10), pp. 1383–1398 (doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.65).
-
7)
-
29. Marc, R.E., Jones, B.W., Watt, C.B., et al: ‘Retinal connectomics: towards complete, accurate networks’, Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 2013, 37, pp. 141–162 (doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.08.002).
-
8)
-
3. Shannon, R.V.: ‘Model of safe levels for electrical stimulation’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1992, 39, (4), pp. 424–426 (doi: 10.1109/10.126616).
-
9)
-
14. Cantrell, D.R., Troy, J.B.: ‘Extracellular stimulation of mouse retinal ganglion cells with non-rectangular voltage-controlled waveforms’. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Minneapolis, USA, September 2009, pp. 642–645.
-
10)
-
32. Stasheff, S.F.: ‘Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse’, J. Neurophysiol., 2008, 99, (3), pp. 1408–1421 (doi: 10.1152/jn.00144.2007).
-
11)
-
36. Goo, Y.S., Park, D.J., Ahn, J.R., et al: ‘Spontaneous oscillatory rhythms in the degenerating mouse retina modulate retinal ganglion cell responses to electrical stimulation’, Front. Cell. Neurosci., 2016, 9, pp. 1–8 (doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00512).
-
12)
-
20. Twyford, P., Fried, S.: ‘The retinal response to sinusoidal electrical stimulation’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2016, 24, (4), pp. 413–423 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2415811).
-
13)
-
25. Haselier, C., Biswas, S., Rösch, S., et al: ‘Correlations between specific patterns of spontaneous activity and stimulation efficiency in degenerated retina’, PLoS ONE, 2017, 12, (12), pp. 1–16 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190048).
-
14)
-
7. Normann, R.A., Maynard, E.M., Guillory, K.S., et al: ‘Cortical implants for the blind’, IEEE Spectr., 1996, 33, (5), pp. 54–59 (doi: 10.1109/6.490057).
-
15)
-
21. Raz-Prag, D., Beit-Yaakov, G., Hanein, Y.: ‘Electrical stimulation of different retinal components and the effect of asymmetric pulses’, J. Neurosci. Methods, 2017, 291, pp. 20–27 (doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.07.028).
-
16)
-
6. Ayton, L.N., Blamey, P.J., Guymer, R.H., et al: ‘First-in-human trial of a novel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis’, PLoS ONE, 2014, 9, (12), pp. 1–26 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115239).
-
17)
-
1. Bourne, R.R.A., Flaxman, S.R., Braithwaite, T., et al: ‘Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Lancet Global Health, 2017, 5, (9), pp. 888–897 (doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0).
-
18)
-
34. Margolis, D.J., Gartland, A.J., Singer, J.H., et al: ‘Network oscillations drive correlated spiking of ON and OFF ganglion cells in the rd1 mouse model of retinal degeneration’, PLoS ONE, 2014, 9, (1), pp. 1–12 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086253).
-
19)
-
16. Hadjinicolaou, A.E., Savage, C.O., Apollo, N.V., et al: ‘Optimizing the electrical stimulation of retinal ganglion cells’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2015, 23, (2), pp. 169–178 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2361900).
-
20)
-
11. Trenholm, S., Awatramani, G.B.: ‘Origins of spontaneous activity in the degenerating retina’, Front. Cell. Neurosci., 2015, 9, pp. 1–7 (doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00277).
-
21)
-
8. Kosta, P., Paknahad, J., Rodríguez, E.S.G., et al: ‘Electromagnetic safety assessment of a cortical implant for vision restoration’, IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microw. Med. Biol., 2018, 2, (1), pp. 56–63 (doi: 10.1109/JERM.2018.2812302).
-
22)
-
39. McCreery, D.B., Agnew, W.F., Yuen, T.G., et al: ‘Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1990, 37, (10), pp. 996–1001 (doi: 10.1109/10.102812).
-
23)
-
22. Weitz, A.C., Nanduri, D., Behrend, M.R., et al: ‘Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration’, Sci. Transl. Med., 2015, 7, (318), pp. 1–12 (doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac4877).
-
24)
-
15. Nakano, Y., Terasawa, Y., Kanda, H., et al: ‘Sinusoidal electrical pulse more efficiently evokes retinal excitation than rectangular electrical pulse in retinal prostheses’, Sens. Mater., 2017, 29, (12), pp. 1667–1677.
-
25)
-
40. Jepson, L.H., Hottowy, P., Weiner, G.A., et al: ‘High-fidelity reproduction of spatiotemporal visual signals for retinal prosthesis’, Neuron, 2014, 83, (1), pp. 87–92 (doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.044).
-
26)
-
9. Yue, L., Weiland, J.D., Roska, B., et al: ‘Retinal stimulation strategies to restore vision: fundamentals and systems’, Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 2016, 53, pp. 21–47 (doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.05.002).
-
27)
-
31. Mahadevappa, M., Weiland, J.D., Yanai, D., et al: ‘Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2005, 13, (2), pp. 201–206 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848687).
-
28)
-
33. Stasheff, S.F., Shankar, M., Andrews, M.P.: ‘Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice’, J. Neurophysiol., 2011, 105, (6), pp. 3002–3009 (doi: 10.1152/jn.00704.2010).
-
29)
-
5. Shepherd, R.K., Shivdasani, M.N., Nayagam, D.A.X., et al: ‘Visual prostheses for the blind’, Trends Biotechnol., 2013, 31, (10), pp. 562–571 (doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.07.001).
-
30)
-
37. Merrill, D.R., Bikson, M., Jefferys, J.G.R.: ‘Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols’, J. Neurosci. Methods, 2005, 141, (2), pp. 171–198 (doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020).
-
31)
-
12. Borowska, J., Trenholm, S., Awatramani, G.B.: ‘An intrinsic neural oscillator in the degenerating mouse retina’, J. Neurosci., 2011, 31, (13), pp. 5000–5012 (doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5800-10.2011).
-
32)
-
17. Nakano, Y., Terasawa, Y., Kanda, H., et al: ‘Effects of asymmetric electrical pulse on retinal excitement for retinal prostheses’, Sens. Mater., 2018, 30, (2), pp. 315–326.
-
33)
-
30. Hines, M.L., Carnevale, N.T.: ‘The NEURON simulation environment’, Neural Comput., 1997, 9, (6), pp. 1179–1209 (doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1179).
-
34)
-
27. Loizos, K., Lazzi, G., Lauritzen, J.S., et al: ‘A multi-scale computational model for the study of retinal prosthetic stimulation’. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Chicago, USA, August 2014, pp. 6100–6103.
-
35)
-
35. Zeck, G.: ‘Aberrant activity in degenerated retinas revealed by electrical imaging’, Front. Cell. Neurosci., 2016, 10, pp. 1–7 (doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00025).
-
36)
-
10. Choi, H., Zhang, L., Cembrowski, M.S., et al: ‘Intrinsic bursting of AII amacrine cells underlies oscillations in the rd1 mouse retina’, J. Neurophysiol., 2014, 112, (6), pp. 1491–1504 (doi: 10.1152/jn.00437.2014).
-
37)
-
2. Weiland, J.D., Humayun, M.S.: ‘Retinal prosthesis’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2014, 61, (5), pp. 1412–1424 (doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2314733).
-
38)
-
13. Weitz, A.C., Behrend, M.R., Ahuja, A.K., et al: ‘Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses’, J. Neural Eng., 2014, 11, (1), pp. 1–18 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/1/016007).
-
39)
-
24. Fried, S.I., Hsueh, H.A., Werblin, F.S.: ‘A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation’, J. Neurophysiol., 2006, 95, (2), pp. 970–978 (doi: 10.1152/jn.00849.2005).
-
40)
-
18. Lee, J.I., Im, M.: ‘Non-rectangular waveforms are more charge-efficient than rectangular one in eliciting network-mediated responses of ON type retinal ganglion cells’, J. Neural Eng., 2018, 15, (5), pp. 1–17 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aad416).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2019.0115
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/htl.2019.0115
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6