Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Muscular activity and physical interaction forces during lower limb exoskeleton use

Spinal cord injury (SCI) typically manifests with a loss of sensorimotor control of the lower limbs. In order to overcome some of the disadvantages of chronic wheelchair use by such patients, robotic exoskeletons are an emerging technology that has the potential to transform the lives of patients. However, there are a number of points of contact between the robot and the user, which lead to interaction forces. In a recent study, the authors have shown that peak interaction forces are particularly prominent at the anterior aspect of the right leg. This study uses a similar experimental protocol with additional electromyography (EMG) analysis to examine whether such interaction forces are due to the muscular activity of the participant or the movement of the exoskeleton itself. Interestingly, the authors found that peak forces preceded peak EMG activity. This study did not find a significant correlation between EMG activity and force data, which would indicate that the interaction forces can largely be attributed to the movement of the exoskeleton itself. However, we also report significantly higher correlation coefficients in muscle/force pairs located at the anterior aspect of the right leg. In their previous research, the authors have shown peak interaction forces at the same locations, which suggests that muscular activity of the participant makes a more significant contribution to the interaction forces at these locations. The findings of this study are of significance for incomplete SCI patients, for whom EMG activity may provide an important input to an intuitive control schema.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 10. Rathore, T.A., Wilcox, M., Morgado Ramirez, D.Z., et alQuantifying the human-robot interaction forces between a lower limb exoskeleton and healthy users’. Proc. Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society, 2016.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 14. Barbareschi, G., Richards, R., Thornton, M., et al: ‘Statically vs dynamically balanced gait: Analysis of a robotic exoskeleton compared with a human’. Proc. of the Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, November 2015, vol. 2015, pp. 67286731.
    7. 7)
      • 15. Bluestein, D., Javaheri, A.: ‘Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management’, Am. Fam. Physician, 2008, 78, (10), pp. 11861194.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 12. Reza, S.M.T., Ahmad, N., Choudhury, I.A., et al: ‘A study on muscle activities through surface EMG for lower limb exoskeleton controller’. 2013 IEEE Conf. on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC), 2013, pp. 159163.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 5. Pons, J.L.: ‘Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons2008.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 6. Schiele, A.: ‘An explicit model to predict and interpret constraint force creation in phri with exoskeletons’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2008. ICRA 2008.2008, pp. 13241330.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2016.0063
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2016.0063
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address