Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess ECG artefact identification and removal in mHealth systems for continuous patient monitoring

Continuous patient monitoring systems acquire enormous amounts of data that is either manually analysed by doctors or automatically processed using intelligent algorithms. Sections of data acquired over long period of time can be corrupted with artefacts due to patient movement, sensor placement and interference from other sources. Owing to the large volume of data these artefacts need to be automatically identified so that the analysis systems and doctors are aware of them while making medical diagnosis. Three important factors are explored that must be considered and quantified for the design and evaluation of automatic artefact identification algorithms: signal quality, interpretation quality and computational complexity. The first two are useful to determine the effectiveness of an algorithm, whereas the third is particularly vital in mHealth systems where computational resources are heavily constrained. A series of artefact identification and filtering algorithms are then presented focusing on the electrocardiography data. These algorithms are quantified using the three metrics to demonstrate how different algorithms can be evaluated and compared to select the best ones for a given wireless sensor network.

References

    1. 1)
      • 23. Liu, C., Li, P., Zhao, L., et al: ‘Real-time signal quality assessment for ECGs collected using mobile phones’. 2011 Computing in Cardiology, September 2011.
    2. 2)
      • 20. von Borries, R., Pierluissi, J., Nazeran, H.: ‘Wavelet transform-based ECG baseline drift removal for body surface potential mapping’. IEEE EMBC, Shanghai, September 2005.
    3. 3)
      • 26. Orphanidou, C., Bonnici, T., Charlton, P., et al: ‘Signal-quality indices for the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: derivation and applications to wireless monitoring’, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf., 2015, 19, (3), pp. 832838.
    4. 4)
      • 22. Herrera, R.E., Cain, J.T., Capet, E., et al: ‘A high resolution ECG tool for detection of atrial and ventricular late potentials’. Computers in Cardiology, Indianapolis, September 1996.
    5. 5)
      • 24. Moody, B.E.: ‘Rule-based methods for ECG quality control’. 2011 Computing in Cardiology, September 2011.
    6. 6)
      • 1. Kafalı, Ö., Bromuri, S., Sindlar, M., et al: ‘Commodity12: a smart e-health environment for diabetes management’, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ., 2013, 5, (5), pp. 479502.
    7. 7)
      • 14. Fraser, G.D., Chan, A.D.C., Green, J.R., et al: ‘Detection of ADC clipping, quantization noise, and amplifier saturation in surface electromyography’. IEEE MeMeA, Budapest, May 2012.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 9. Clifford, G.D., Moody, G.B.: ‘Signal quality in cardiorespiratory monitoring’, Physiol. Meas., 2012, 33, (9).
    10. 10)
      • 21. Hao, W., Chen, Y., Xin, Y.: ‘ECG baseline wander correction by mean–median filter and discrete wavelet transform’. IEEE EMBC, Boston, September 2011.
    11. 11)
      • 19. Pandia, K., Ravindran, S., Cole, R., et al: ‘Motion artifact cancellation to obtain heart sounds from a single chest-worn accelerometer’. IEEE ICASSP, Boston, March 2010.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 15. ENTSO-E: ‘Network code on load-frequency control and reserves’, 2013. Available at https://www.entsoe.eu/.
    14. 14)
      • 10. Clifford, G.D., Azuaje, F., McSharry, P.: ‘Advanced methods and tools for ECG data analysis’ (Artech House, 2006).
    15. 15)
      • 5. Buendia-Fuentes, F., Arnau-Vives, M.A., Arnau-Vives, A., et al: ‘High-bandpass filters in electrocardiography: source of error in the interpretation of the ST segment’, ISRN Cardiol., 2012. Available at http://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2012/706217/cta/.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 8. P. S. Hamilton – E. P. Limited: ‘Open source ECG analysis software documentation’, 2016. Available at http://www.eplimited.com/.
    21. 21)
      • 13. Redmond, S.J., Lovell, N.H., Basilakis, J., et al: ‘ECG quality measures in telecare monitoring’. IEEE EMBC, Vancouver, August 2008.
    22. 22)
      • 3. Zephyr Technology Corporation: ‘BioHarness 3’, 2016. Available at http://www.zephyranywhere.com/products/bioharness-3.
    23. 23)
      • 7. Chavan, M.S., Agarwala, R.A., Uplane, M.D.: ‘Digital FIR equiripple notch filter on ECG signal for removal of power line interference’, WSEAS Trans. Signal Process., 2008, 4, (4), pp. 221230.
    24. 24)
      • 25. Johannesen, L.: ‘Assessment of ECG quality on an Android platform’. 2011 Computing in Cardiology, September 2011.
    25. 25)
      • 16. Vaseghi, S.V.: ‘Multimedia signal processing: theory and applications in speech, music and communications’. Wiley, United Kingdom, 2007.
    26. 26)
      • 12. Ottenbacher, J., Kirst, M.: ‘Reliable motion artifact detection for ECG monitoring systems with dry electrodes’. IEEE EMBC, Vancouver, August 2008.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2016.0020
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2016.0020
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address