Electrical isolation of InP and InGaAs using iron and krypton

Access Full Text

Electrical isolation of InP and InGaAs using iron and krypton

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
Electronics Letters — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Both n-type InP and InGaAs layers are electrically isolated using iron and krypton ion implantation at 77K to create thermally-stable highly resistive regions. The data suggests that, in both InP and InGaAs, chemical induced compensation operates above a post-implant annealing temperature of 500°C for iron implant isolation. However, in the case of krypton, damage induced isolation is the only compensation mechanism responsible for electrical isolation in both materials. The isolation scheme used looks promising to III–V semiconductor industries since such high sheet resistance values (∼107 Ω/sq) with a broad thermally-stable window are obtained for both n-type InP and InGaAs materials.

Inspec keywords: iron; gallium arsenide; electric resistance; indium compounds; ion implantation; annealing; carrier density; semiconductor thin films; III-V semiconductors; thermal stability; krypton

Other keywords: InP:Fe; sheet resistance; InP layers; krypton ion implantation; InP:Kr; damage induced isolation; thermally stable; III-V semiconductor industries; 77 K; iron ion implantation; implant annealing temperature; InGaAs layers; electrical isolation; resistive regions

Subjects: Semiconductor doping; Doping and implantation of impurities; Electrical properties of II-VI and III-V semiconductors (thin films, low-dimensional and nanoscale structures); Annealing processes in semiconductor technology; Thin film growth, structure, and epitaxy; Annealing processes; Low-field transport and mobility; piezoresistance (semiconductors/insulators); II-VI and III-V semiconductors

References

    1. 1)
      • J.F. Ziegler , J.P. Biersack , U. Littmark . (1985) The stopping and range of ions in solids.
    2. 2)
      • A. Kadoun . Study of deep level defect behaviour in rapid thermal annealed Fe-doped semi-insulating InP. Mater. Sci. Eng. B , 188 - 191
    3. 3)
      • M.C. Ridgway . MEV In-ion implantation for electrical isolation of p+-InP. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B , 835 - 837
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Almonte, M.: `Implant isolation study of In', SIMC-X, Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Semi. and Insul. Mat., 1988, p. 29–32.
    7. 7)
      • Too, P.: `Implant isolation of InP and InGaAs by proton irradiation at variable doses and substrate temperatures', Proc. Int. Symp. on Elec. Dev. for Micro. and Optoelec. Appl., 2001, Vienna, p. 125–130.
    8. 8)
      • S.J. Pearton . Ion implantation for isolation of III–V semiconductors. Mater. Sci. Rep. , 313 - 367
    9. 9)
      • S. Fung , R.J. Nicholas , R.A. Stradling . A study of the deep acceptor levels of iron in InP. J. Phys. C , 5145 - 5155
    10. 10)
      • Too, P.: `Implant isolation of both ', 11thIEEE Int. Symp. on Elec. Dev. for Micro. and Opto. Appl., 2003, Orlando, p. 18–23.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el_20045922
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el_20045922
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading