Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Comparison of H.263 and H.26L video compression performance with web-cams

Comparison of H.263 and H.26L video compression performance with web-cams

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
Electronics Letters — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The results of a comparison of the compression efficiency of the H.263 and H.26L algorithms are presented when used to compress video from a variety of cameras. It is shown that H.26L achieves better compression performance in most cases, with larger compression gains being achieved when higher quality cameras are used.


    1. 1)
      • Topiwala, P., Sullivan, G., Joch, A., Kossentini, F.: `Overview and performance evaluation of the draft ITU-T H.26L video coding standard', Proc. SPIE, Appl. Dig. Im. Proc., Aug. 2001.
    2. 2)
      • Bjontegaard, G.: `Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves', 8thMtg of the Video Coding Experts Group, VCEG-M33, April 2001, Austin, TX, USA,
    3. 3)
      • Wiegand, T.: `Joint video team, working draft number 2', ,
    4. 4)
      • `ITU-T and ISO/IEC to produce next generation video coding standard', News 2002, ,
    5. 5)
      • `Video coding for low bit rate communication', Recommendation H.263, February 1998,

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address