access icon free Spiking neural network approaches PCA with metaheuristics

This Letter presents meaningful results that demonstrate the reduction of dimensionality by spiking neural networks (SNNs) on benchmarking data. This experimental scheme includes metaheuristics, namely, the artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC algorithm) for finding optimal conductance values in the SNNs. Therefore, the objective function in the used ABC algorithm leads the SNNs to compute the principal component analysis (PCA), efficiently. The eigendecomposition of the information drawn by the SNNs in the training phase is the base of the formulated objective function. In these experiments, the Izhikevich model represents the spiking neurons, which have biological plausibility with parameters for reproducing a uniform firing rate. The visualisation of clusters in the 3D PCA space, whose sample values are compared with the PCA function in Matlab, is also shown; this comparison demonstrates an acceptable error in the MSE sense.

Inspec keywords: principal component analysis; neural nets; neurophysiology; optimisation; mean square error methods

Other keywords: spiking neurons; formulated objective function; ABC algorithm; artificial bee colony algorithm; SNNs; principal component analysis; optimal conductance values; meaningful results; PCA function; metaheuristics; neural network; experimental scheme

Subjects: Optimisation techniques; Other topics in statistics; Other topics in statistics; Computer vision and image processing techniques; Optimisation techniques; Neural computing techniques; Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics

References

    1. 1)
      • 2. Schliebs, S., Kasabov, N.: ‘Computational modeling with spiking neural networks’, in Kasabov, N. (Ed.): ‘Springer handbook of bio-/neuroinformatics’ (Springer-Verlag, Berlin & Heidelberg, 2014), pp. 625646.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 1. Izhikevich, E.M.: ‘Dynamical systems in neuroscience: the geometry of excitability and bursting’ (The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA, 2007).
    4. 4)
      • 3. Sjöström, J., Gerstner, W.: ‘Spike-timing dependent plasticity’, https://icwww.epfl.ch/~gerstner/PUBLICATIONS/STDP-Scholarpedia2010.pdf, accessed September 2018.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems, University of California, Irvine, USA, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Twin+gas+sensor+arrays, accessed January 2019, https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wine+quality, accessed April 2019, https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Pen-Based+Recognition+of+Handwritten+Digits, accessed June 2019.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 9. Jolliffe, I.T., Cadima, J.: ‘Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments’, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 2016, 374, (2064), pp. 116, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 4. Gerstner, W.: ‘Hebbian learning and plasticity’, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f9fc/99a5c52aa5df1b530dfdeb25dfb6b10bdecf.pdf, accessed November 2018.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2020.0283
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2020.0283
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading