access icon free Early termination refresh to reduce refresh overhead

Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) is mainly used as the main memory in modern computers. Since data is stored in a memory cell that is composed of a capacitor and a transistor, the cell must be periodically refreshed to prevent data loss due to charge leakage. The refresh operation dissipates energy and degrades system performance. Existing DRAM devices determine the refresh interval based on the retention time of the weakest memory cell. However, most DRAM memory cells retain data much longer than the weakest cell. In this Letter, the authors propose a refresh method with early termination that stops the refresh operations early before the completion depending on the retention time. To minimise changes in the existing auto-refresh (AR) operation, the proposed early termination refresh (ETR) uses the same refresh granularity as AR, which is a row group, and marks different retention times for each row group in the memory array. While refreshing a row group in a DRAM device, ETR reads the retention time marked in the memory array and stops the refresh operation if the remaining refresh operations are redundant. ETR improves the average system throughput by 3.1% and reduces the refresh power by 65.4% over AR.

Inspec keywords: DRAM chips

Other keywords: early termination refresh; data loss; weakest memory cell; dynamic random access memory; DRAM devices; refresh overhead reduction; auto-refresh operation; system performance degradation; ETR; charge leakage; DRAM memory cells; memory array; transistor; capacitor

Subjects: Memory circuits; Semiconductor storage

References

    1. 1)
      • 6. Eyerman, S., Eeckhout, L.: ‘System-level performance metrics for multiprogram workloads’, Micro, 2008, 28, (3), pp. 4253.
    2. 2)
      • 3. ‘8Gb: x4, x8, x16 DDR3 SDRAM’. Available at www.micron.com/products/datasheets, accessed 16 September 2017.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2017.3843
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2017.3843
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading