Endurance of magnetic tunnel junctions under dynamic voltage stress

Endurance of magnetic tunnel junctions under dynamic voltage stress

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
Electronics Letters — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

MgAl2O4 (MAO)-based magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) with an MAO thickness of ∼1.25 nm are fabricated and their cycling characteristics under dynamic voltage stress are evaluated. The speed of breakdown strongly depended on the pulse polarities used, bipolar, positive (+) unipolar, and negative (−) unipolar. The bipolar condition yielded more rapid breakdown under cycling. Between the two unipolar conditions, positive bias yielded more rapid breakdown than negative bias; the difference between these is understood to arise from the conditions of the interface between the MAO and ferromagnetic layers. Among apparently normal MTJ cells showing little resistance drift, 20% were degraded during a long cycling test in the bipolar stress condition. Thus, the use of bipolar voltage stress is essential to screen for potentially defective MTJs, and the asymmetric condition at the interface is minimised by process control for application of the simple unipolar bias condition.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Hosomi, M., Yamagishi, H., Yamamoto, T., Bessho, K., Higo, Y., Yamane, K., Yamada, H., Shoji, M., Hachino, H., Fukumoto, C., Nagao, H., Kano, H.: ‘A novel non-volatile memory with spin torque transfer magnetization switching: spin-RAM’. IEDM Technical Digest, Washington, DC, USA, 2005, pp. 459462, doi 10.1109/IEDM.2005.1609379.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 4. Hosotani, K., Nagamine, M., Aikawa, H., Shimomura, N., Nakayama, M., Kai, T., Ikegawa, S., Asao, Y., Yoda, H., Nitayama, A.: ‘Resistance drift of MgO magnetic tunnel junctions by trapping and degradation of coherent tunneling’. IEEE Int. Reliability Physics Symp., Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2008, pp. 703704, doi 10.1109/Relphy.2008.4558997.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Sukegawa, H., Xiu, H., Ohkubo, T., Furubayashi, T., Niizeki, T., Wang, W., Kasai, S., Mitani, S., Inomata, K., Hono, K.: ‘Tunnel magnetoresistance with improved bias voltage dependence in lattice-matched Fe/spinel MgAl2O4/Fe(001) junctions’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2010, 96, pp. 212505-1212505-3, doi 10.1063/1.3441409.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 11. Carboni, R., Ambrogio, S., Chen, W., Siddik, M., Harms, J., Lyle, A., Kula, W., Sandhu, G., Ielmini, D.: ‘Understanding cycling endurance in perpendicular spin-transfer torque (p-STT) magnetic memory’. IEDM, San Francisco, USA, 2016, pp. 572575, doi 10.1109/IEDM.2016.7838468.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address