References

• 1. 1)
     • 2. Kim, Y.J.D., Bajcsy, J.: ‘Iterative receiver for faster-than-Nyquist broadcasting’, Electron. Lett., 2012, 48, (24), pp. 1–2.
  2. 2)
     • 8. Ringh, E.: ‘Low complexity algorithms for faster-than-Nyquist signaling’, Master of Science thesis, School of Engineering Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden2013.
  3. 3)
     • 3. Cioni, S., De Gaudenzi, R., Rinaldo, R.: ‘Channel estimation and physical layer adaptation techniques for satellite networks exploiting adaptive coding and modulation’, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw., 2008, 26, (2), pp. 157–188 (doi: 10.1002/sat.901).
  4. 4)
     • 3. Gappmair, W.: ‘Cramér-Rao lower bound for non-data-aided SNR estimation of linear modulation schemes’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2008, 56, (5), pp. 689–693 (doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2008.060275).
  5. 5)
     • 2. Kim, Y.J.D., Bajcsy, J.: ‘Iterative receiver for faster-than-Nyquist broadcasting’, Electron. Lett., 2012, 48, (24), pp. 1–2.
  6. 6)
     • 8. Banelli, P., Buzzi, S., Colavolpe, G., Modenini, A., Rusek, F., Ugolini, A.: ‘Modulation formats and waveforms for 5G networks: Who will be the heir of OFDM?: an overview of alternative modulation schemes for improved spectral efficiency’, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 2014, 31, (6), pp. 80–93 (doi: 10.1109/MSP.2014.2337391).
  7. 7)
     • 3. Prlja, A., Anderson, J.B.: ‘Reduced-complexity receivers for strongly narrowband intersymbol interference introduced by faster-than-Nyquist signaling’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2012, 60, (9), pp. 2591–2610 (doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2012.070912.110296).
  8. 8)
     • 1. Pauluzzi, D.R., Beaulieu, N.C.: ‘A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2000, 48, (10), pp. 1681–1691 (doi: 10.1109/26.871393).
  9. 9)
     • 2. Alagha, N.: ‘Cramér-Rao bounds of SNR estimates for BPSK and QPSK modulated signals’, IEEE Commun. Lett., 2001, 5, (1), pp. 10–12 (doi: 10.1109/4234.901810).