access icon free Minimising nonlinear Raman crosstalk in future network overlays on legacy passive optical networks

There is a desire to overlay future optical access networks onto legacy passive optical networks (PONs) to provide increasingly advanced services by filling empty wavelength bands of legacy gigabit rate PONs. Nonlinear Raman crosstalk from new wavelengths onto legacy RF video services (1550–1560 nm band) and onto the legacy digital downstream at 1490 nm, however, can limit the number and the launch power of new wavelengths. As an example, straightforward physical-layer adjustments at the optical line terminal that increase the number of new, 10 Gbit/s channels launched in the 1575–1580 nm band by a factor of 16 without increasing the Raman penalty on the video signal are illustrated. A physical-layer (RF) filter modifies the on–off-keyed signal feeding each 10 Gbit/s transmitter, suppressing the RF Raman crosstalk on the video signal by 9 dB while incurring a power penalty on each 10 Gbit/s link of <0.5 (2.0) dB with (without) forward error correction. The previous Raman mitigation work used non-standard line-coding to shape the 10 Gbit/s electrical spectrum. In addition, polarisation-interleaving of new wavelengths lowers the worst-case RF DC crosstalk by ∼3 dB in fibres and it limits and stabilises DC crosstalk in low polarisation mode dispersion fibre links.

Inspec keywords: optical fibre filters; video coding; optical fibre polarisation; telecommunication channels; passive optical networks; amplitude shift keying; optical transmitters; forward error correction; optical crosstalk; optical fibre dispersion; nonlinear optics; optical links

Other keywords: polarisation-interleaving; launch power; worst-case RF DC crosstalk; nonlinear Raman crosstalk; electrical spectrum; wavelength 1575 nm to 1580 nm; forward error correction; physical-layer filter; transmitter; on-off-keyed signal feeding; bit rate 10 Gbit/s; wavelength 1550 nm to 1560 nm; RF Raman crosstalk; power penalty; optical line terminal; legacy passive optical networks; RF filter; legacy RF video services; video signal; legacy digital down-streaming; legacy gigabit rate PON; optical access networks; nonstandard line-coding; polarisation mode dispersion fibre links

Subjects: Codes; Optical fibre networks; Subscriber loops; Fibre optics; Optical coatings and filters; Optical communication equipment

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 2. Coppinger, F., Chen, L.P., Piehler, D.: ‘Nonlinear Raman cross-talk in a video overlay passive optical network’. Optical Fiber Communications Conf., Atlanta, CA, USA, March 2003, paper TuR5, doi: 10.1109/OFC.2003.1247660.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 4. Colella, B., Effenberger, F.J., Shimer, C., Tian, F.: ‘Raman crosstalk control in passive optical networks’. Optical Fiber Communications Conf., Anaheim, CA, USA, March 2006, paper NWD6, 10.1109/OFC.2006.215670.
    5. 5)
      • 1. Piehler, D., Meyrueix, P., Rishi, G., Chen, L.P., Coppinger, F.: ‘Nonlinear Raman crosstalk in a 125-Mb/s CWDM overlay on a 1310-nm video access network’. Optical Fiber Communications Conf., Los Angeles, CA, USA, February 2004, paper FE8.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 3. Agata, A., Murakami, A., Imai, K., Horiuchi, Y., Edagawa, N.: ‘Influence of stimulated Raman scattering in video overlay EPON systems on downstream data signal’. 31st European Conf. Optical Communications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2005, paper We.4.5.7, doi: 10.1049/cp:200504165.
    8. 8)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2014.0806
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2014.0806
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Correspondence
This article has following corresponding article(s):
interview