Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Ultrasonic imaging contrast enhancement using modified dehaze image model

In practical ultrasonic images, post-processing that involves incoherent frame averaging such as persistence, spatial compounding and frequency compounding creates a layer of smoothed out electronic noise that is analogous to fog in photographic images. A novel approach to enhance ultrasound image contrast based on a modified dark channel model used to dehaze photographs is presented. Local minimum intensity is used to highlight image contrast, control influence of noise layer and improve detail resolution by different levels. The experimental results show that the proposed method has better performance over the existing methods in improving the quality of the ultrasonic image.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Narasimhan, S.G., Nayar, S.K.: ‘Contrast restoration of weather degraded images’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2003, 25, (6), pp. 713724 (doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1201821).
    2. 2)
      • 5. Ahmed, R., Karmakar, G.C., Dooley, L.S.: ‘Texture as pixel feature for video object segmentation’, Electron. Lett., 2008, 44, (19), pp. 11271128 (doi: 10.1049/el:20080407).
    3. 3)
      • 2. He, K.M., Sun, J., Tang, X.O.: ‘Single image haze removal using dark channel prior’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2011, 33, (12), pp. 23412353 (doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168).
    4. 4)
      • 4. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugan, K., Dinstein, I.: ‘Texture features for image classification’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1973, 3, (8), pp. 610621 (doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314).
    5. 5)
      • 6. Rahman, M.H., Pickering, M.R., Frater, M.R., Kerr, D.: ‘Texture feature extraction method for scale and rotation invariant image retrieval’, Electron. Lett., 2012, 48, (11), pp. 626627 (doi: 10.1049/el.2012.0507).
    6. 6)
      • 3. Greenspan, H., Anderson, C.H., Akber, S.: ‘Image enhancement by nonlinear extrapolation in frequency space’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2000, 9, (6), pp. 10351048 (doi: 10.1109/83.846246).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2012.4256
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2012.4256
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address