Performances of airborne vapor cycle system under a typical helicopter flight profile
Performances of airborne vapor cycle system under a typical helicopter flight profile
- Author(s): Z. Zhu 1 ; C. Fu 1 ; Y. Xu 1 ; W. Xia 1
- DOI: 10.1049/icp.2021.0244
For access to this article, please select a purchase option:
Buy conference paper PDF
Buy Knowledge Pack
IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.
Thank you
Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.
- Author(s): Z. Zhu 1 ; C. Fu 1 ; Y. Xu 1 ; W. Xia 1
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
Key Laboratory of Aircraft Environment Control and Life Support MIIT , Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing , China
Source:
CSAA/IET International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems (AUS 2020),
2021
p.
324 – 328
-
Affiliations:
1:
Key Laboratory of Aircraft Environment Control and Life Support MIIT , Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing , China
- Conference: CSAA/IET International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems (AUS 2020)
- DOI: 10.1049/icp.2021.0244
- ISBN: 978-1-83953-419-5
- Location: Online Conference
- Conference date: 18-21 September 2020
- Format: PDF
Based on AMESim, a simulation model of airborne vapor cycle system was established, and solved under a typical helicopter flight profile, by controlling the compressor rotation speed via the proportional-integral method. The results show that the lower the cabin setting temperature is, the greater the refrigerating capacity of the system is, the smaller the COP is, the greater the heat transfer efficiency of the microchannel heat exchangers is, and the greater the refrigerant pressure drop is. Besides, the characteristics of system and its heat exchangers change dramatically at different flight phases. In the ground standby and climbing phases, the characteristics change obviously; in the cruising phase II, they remain stable as the cabin setting temperature is achieved; in the descending phase, they increase and then decrease due to the coupling effect of flight velocity and ambient temperature, except for the COP which keeps declining; in the ground parking phase, they tend to be stable.
Inspec keywords: mechanical engineering computing; refrigerants; compressors; PI control; velocity control; heat transfer; microchannel flow; helicopters; refrigeration; heat exchangers; control engineering computing
Subjects: Aerospace control; Velocity, acceleration and rotation control; Civil and mechanical engineering computing; Aerospace industry; Applied fluid mechanics; Mechanical engineering applications of IT; Engineering materials; Control engineering computing; Fluid mechanics and aerodynamics (mechanical engineering); Mechanical components; Heat and thermodynamic processes (mechanical engineering); Convection and heat transfer; Control of other power systems