Rocket motion simulation analysis and risk assessment of the tower for transmission line
Rocket motion simulation analysis and risk assessment of the tower for transmission line
- Author(s): Y. Linping 1 ; W. Zhiyong 1 ; J. Hong 2 ; Z. Zhen 1 ; W. Tian 2
- DOI: 10.1049/icp.2020.0295
For access to this article, please select a purchase option:
Buy conference paper PDF
Buy Knowledge Pack
IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.
Thank you
Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.
- Author(s): Y. Linping 1 ; W. Zhiyong 1 ; J. Hong 2 ; Z. Zhen 1 ; W. Tian 2
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
State Grid Huzhou Power Supply Company , Huzhou, Zhejiang , China ;
2: China Three Gorges University , Yichang, Hubei , China
Source:
The 16th IET International Conference on AC and DC Power Transmission (ACDC 2020),
2021
p.
2150 – 2154
-
Affiliations:
1:
State Grid Huzhou Power Supply Company , Huzhou, Zhejiang , China ;
- Conference: The 16th IET International Conference on AC and DC Power Transmission (ACDC 2020)
- DOI: 10.1049/icp.2020.0295
- ISBN: 978-1-83953-330-3
- Location: Online Conference
- Conference date: 02-03 July 2020
- Format: PDF
In order to reduce the disaster caused by the instability of the tower caused by the rolling stone impact, this article will use Rocfall software to build a model slope, simulate the rolling trajectory, bounce height, and impact kinetic energy, and then combine the Hertzian collision theory with energy conservation theorem and the Japanese formula estimate the maximum impact force of a rolling stone when it hits the tower, in order to evaluate the danger of the rolling stone to the tower. The calculation results show that the magnitude of the rolling stone impact force on the legs of the tower is approximately 3.6×106∼2.55×107Pa, which is obviously beyond the range that the tower can bear. At the same time, the best control position of the slope is selected by the simulation results. The bottom 25∼75 m is more suitable. It provides a theoretical basis for the study of the protective device of the iron tower and is conducive to the safe and stable operation of the iron tower.
Inspec keywords: geophysical techniques; rocks; poles and towers; geomorphology; disasters
Subjects: Mechanical and acoustic properties of rocks, minerals and soil; Instrumentation and techniques for geophysical, hydrospheric and lower atmosphere research; Other topics in solid Earth physics