Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Fast frequency response for effective frequency control in power systems with low inertia

The increasing penetration of renewable generation has led to the decrease of power systems’ overall inertia, which introduces significant challenges to frequency stability. In this paper, the potential of using Fast Frequency Response (FFR) to enhance frequency control in power systems with low inertia is investigated in detail. A Generic System Frequency Response (GSFR) model taking into account of the penetration level of Non-Synchronous Generation (NSG) and FFR has been developed and used to investigate the impact of reduced inertia on frequency control and demonstrate that the amount of reserve power to be scheduled can be significantly reduced with the deployment of FFR. The impact of the different FFR resources' characteristics (e.g. response delay, ramp rate, etc.) on the effectiveness of frequency control is also investigated, based on which the desirable specifications for FFR schemes are summarised. These desirable properties of FFR schemes are taken into account in the design of a wide-area monitoring and control system termed ‘Enhanced Frequency Control Capability (EFCC)’, which is proposed for the delivery of FFR in the future Great Britain transmission system. The design and operation of the EFCC scheme are presented, along with a case study demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing the frequency control.

References

    1. 1)
      • 3. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and Control’ (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1994).
    2. 2)
      • 11. Wilson, D., Clark, S., Norris, S., et al: ‘Advances in wide area monitoring and control to address emerging requirements related to inertia, stability and power transfer in the GB power system’, CIGRE Paris Session, 2016, C2-208.
    3. 3)
      • 8. Ashton, P., Saunders, C., Taylor, G., et al: ‘Inertia estimation of the GB power system using synchrophasor measurements’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, pp. 701709.
    4. 4)
      • 4. National Grid: ‘National electricity transmission system security and quality of supply standard’, 2017.
    5. 5)
      • 9. UK Energy Research Centre: ‘UKERC Energy Supply Theme Synthesis Report’, 2014.
    6. 6)
      • 1. National Grid: ‘System operability framework’, 2016.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Balancing Mechanism Reporting Service, 30 April 2018. Available at https://www.bmreports.com/.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Anderson, P., Mirheydar, M.: ‘A low-order system frequency response model’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1990, 5, pp. 720729.
    9. 9)
      • 5. Wall, P., Shams, N., Terzija, V., et al: ‘Smart frequency control for the future GB power system’, IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conf. Europe (ISGT-Europe), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2016, pp. 16.
    10. 10)
      • 10. National Grid: ‘National electricity transmission system security and quality of supply standard’, 2017.
    11. 11)
      • 2. National Grid: ‘System needs and product strategy’, 2017.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Booth, C., Coffele, F., Burt, G.: ‘The power networks demonstration centre: an environment for accelerated testing, demonstration and validation of existing and novel protection and automation systems’. 12th IET Int. Conf. on Developments in Power System Protection (DPSP 2014), 12th IET Int. Conf. on, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014, pp. 16.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8599
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8599
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address