M, the conservative power quantity based on the flow of energy
- Author(s): Milton Castro-Núñez 1 ; Deysy Londoño-Monsalve 2 ; Róbinson Castro-Puche 3
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering , Universidad Nacional de Colombia , Cra. 30 #45-03, Bogotá D.C ., Colombia ;
2: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering , Universidad Nacional de Colombia , Cra. 27 #64-60, Manizales , Colombia ;
3: Department of Mathematics , Universidad de Córdoba , Cra. 6 #76-103, Montería , Colombia
-
Affiliations:
1:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering , Universidad Nacional de Colombia , Cra. 30 #45-03, Bogotá D.C ., Colombia ;
- Source:
Volume 2016, Issue 7,
July
2016,
p.
269 – 276
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2016.0157 , Online ISSN 2051-3305
- « Previous Article
- Table of contents
- Next Article »
The reactive power in non-sinusoidal circuits is determined here from an energy analysis instead of using the non-sinusoidal apparent power S. In the first of the two energy analyses, circuits previously examined by the currents’ physical components power theory are re-examined using the principle of conservation of energy, the balance principle of the reactive power and the concept of reactive power compensation. This energy analysis yields a reactive power value substantiated by the aforementioned principles and power theory but it also suggests a value of S that differs from its traditional definition. The energy analysis performed with the circuit analysis technique based on geometric algebra, its GN domain power theory and M , a conservative power quantity based on the flow of energy, confirms the reactive power value attained in the former analysis. More importantly, M clarifies three intriguing issues about S: its value, its physical significance and whether this quantity can lead to erroneous conclusions. These, and previous results, demonstrate that the reactive power should be assessed on the energy flow but a multidimensional mathematical framework is needed to better understand energy flow in non-sinusoidal circuits.
Inspec keywords: algebra; reactive power; network analysis; RLC circuits
Other keywords: energy flow; GN domain power theory; circuit analysis technique; conservative power quantity; reactive power balance principle; geometric algebra; conservation of energy theory; reactive power compensation; reactive power value; nonsinusoidal circuits; energy analysis
Subjects: General circuit analysis and synthesis methods; Algebra
References
-
-
1)
-
15. de Leon, F.J., Cohen, J.: ‘AC power theory from Poynting theorem: accurate identification of instantaneous power components in nonlinear-switched circuits’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2010, 25, (4), pp. 2104–2112 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2054117).
-
-
2)
-
21. Petroianu, A.I.: ‘Mathematical representations of electrical power: vector or complex number? neither!’. Electrical Power and Energy Conf., Calgary, AB., November 2014, pp. 170–177.
-
-
3)
-
9. Emanuel, A.E., Langella, R., Testa, A.: ‘Power definitions for circuits with nonlinear and unbalanced loads — The IEEE standard 1459-2010’. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA., July 2012, pp. 1–6.
-
-
4)
-
42. Czarnecki, L.S.: ‘On some misinterpretations of the instantaneous reactive power pq theory’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2004, 19, (3), pp. 828–836, Available at: http://www.ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1296759 (doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2004.826500).
-
-
5)
-
18. Emanuel, A.E.: ‘The randomness power: an other new quantity to be considered’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2007, 22, (3), pp. 1304–1308 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2007.900086).
-
-
6)
-
7. Orts-Grau, S., Muñoz-Galeano, N., Alfonso-Gil, J.C., et al: ‘Discussion on useless active and reactive powers contained in the IEEE standard 1459’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 640–649 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2096519).
-
-
7)
-
24. Williems, J.L.: ‘Budeanu's reactive power and related concepts revisited’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2011, 60, (4), pp. 1182–1186 (doi: 10.1109/TIM.2010.2090704).
-
-
8)
-
37. Herrera, I., Pinder, G.F.: ‘Mathematical modeling in science and engineering an axiomatic approach’ (Wiley, USA, 2012).
-
-
9)
-
20. Chappell, J.M., Drake, S.P., Seidel, C.L., et al: ‘Geometric algebra for electrical and electronic engineers’, Proc. IEEE, 2014, 102, (9), pp. 1340–1363 (doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2339299).
-
-
10)
-
12. de Leon, F., Qaseer, L., Cohen, J.: ‘AC power theory from Poynting theorem: identification of the power components of magnetic saturating and hysteretic circuits’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2012, 27, (3), pp. 1548–1556 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2188652).
-
-
11)
-
8. Chen, C.I.: ‘A two-stage solution procedure for digital power metering according to IEEE standard 1459-2010 in single-phase system’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015, 60, (12), pp. 5550–5557 (doi: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2228146).
-
-
12)
-
31. Castro-Núñez, M.: ‘The use of geometric algebra in the analysis of non-sinusoidal networks and the construction of a unified power theory for single phase systems – a paradigm shift’, PhD thesis, University of Calgary, 2013.
-
-
13)
-
14. Šekara, T.B., Mikulovic, J.C., Djurisic, Z.R.: ‘Optimal reactive compensators in power systems under asymmetrical and nonsinusoidal conditions’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2008, 23, (2), pp. 974–984 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2008.917711).
-
-
14)
-
32. Jancewicz, B.: ‘Multivectors and Clifford algebra in electrodynamics’ (World Science, Singapore, 1988).
-
-
15)
-
3. Fortescue, C.L.: ‘Power, reactive volt-ampere, power factor’, Trans. AIEE, 1933, 52, (3), pp. 758–762.
-
-
16)
-
32. Czarnecki, L., Pearce, S.: ‘Compensation objectives and currents’ physical components based generation of reference signals for shunt switching compensator control’, IET Power Electron., 2009, 2, (1), pp. 33–41 (doi: 10.1049/iet-pel:20070388).
-
-
17)
-
16. de Leon, F.J., Cohen, J.: ‘Discussion of instantaneous reactive power p-q theory and power properties of three-phase systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2008, 23, (3), pp. 1693–1694 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2008.924185).
-
-
18)
-
6. Jin, G., Lop, A., Xial, H.: ‘Expansion of the ohm's law in nonsinusoidal AC circuit’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015, 62, (3), pp. 1363–1371 (doi: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2348939).
-
-
19)
-
34. Czarnecki, L.S.: ‘Minimisation of distortion power of nonsinusoidal sources applied to linear loads’, IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., 1981, 128, (4), pp. 208–210 (doi: 10.1049/ip-c.1981.0034).
-
-
20)
-
26. Castilla, M., Bravo, J.C., Ordóñez, M.: ‘Geometric algebra: a multivectorial proof of Tellegen's theorem in multiterminal networks’, IET Circuits Devices Syst., 2008, 2, (4), pp. 383–390 (doi: 10.1049/iet-cds:20070245).
-
-
21)
-
36. Kuhn, T.S.: ‘The structure of scientific revolutions’ (University of Chicago Press, USA, 1996).
-
-
22)
-
1. Steinmetz, C.P.: ‘Complex quantities and their use in electrical engineering’. Proc. Int. Electrical Congress, Chicago, IL, 1893, pp. 33–74.
-
-
23)
-
33. Oppenheim, A.V., Willsky, A.S., Young, I.T.: ‘Signals and systems’ (Prentice-Hall, Mexico, 1983).
-
-
24)
-
24. Miller, T.J.: ‘Reactive power control in electric systems’ (Wiley, USA, 1982, 2010, 2nd edn.).
-
-
25)
-
35. Bay, S.J.: ‘Fundamentals of linear state space systems’ (McGraw-Hill International Edition, Singapore, 1999).
-
-
26)
-
39. Filipski, P.S.: ‘Apparent power – a misleading quantity in the non-sinusoidal power theory: are all non-sinusoidal power theories doomed to fail?’, ETEP, 1993, 3, (1), pp. 21–26 (doi: 10.1002/etep.4450030105).
-
-
27)
-
52. Castro-Nunez, M., Castro-Puche, R.: ‘The IEEE Standard 1459, the CPC power theory, and geometric algebra in circuits with nonsinusoidal sources and linear loads’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap., 2012, 59, (12), pp. 2980–2990, Available at: http://www.ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6265343 (doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2206471).
-
-
28)
-
23. Czarnecki, L.S.: ‘Considerations on the reactive power in nonsinusoidal situations’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 1985, 34, (3), pp. 399–403 (doi: 10.1109/TIM.1985.4315358).
-
-
29)
-
19. Shepherd, W., Zand, P.: ‘Energy flow and power factor in nonsinusoidal circuits’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979).
-
-
30)
-
28. Castro-Núñez, M., Castro-Puche, R., Nowicki, E.: ‘The use of geometric algebra in circuit analysis and its impact on the definition of power’. Nonsinusoidal Currents Compensation, Łagów, Poland, June 2010, pp. 89–95.
-
-
31)
-
25. Menti, A., Zacharias, T., Milias-Argitis, J.: ‘Geometric algebra: a powerful tool for representing power under nonsinusoidal conditions’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, 2007, 54, (3), pp. 601–609 (doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2006.887608).
-
-
32)
-
22. Petroianu, A.I.: ‘A geometric algebra reformulation and interpretation of Steinmetz's symbolic method and his power expression in alternating current electrical circuits’, Electr. Eng., 2015, 97, (3), pp. 175–180 (doi: 10.1007/s00202-014-0325-y).
-
-
33)
-
4. Lyon, W.V.: ‘Reactive power and power factor’, Trans. AIEE, 1933, 52, (3), pp. 763–770.
-
-
34)
-
5. Emanuel, A.E.: ‘Powers in nonsinusoidal situations – a review of definitions and physical meaning’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1990, 5, (3), pp. 1377–1389 (doi: 10.1109/61.57980).
-
-
35)
-
29. Castro-Núñez, M., Castro-Puche, R.: ‘Advantages of geometric algebra over complex numbers in the analysis of networks with nonsinusoidal sources and linear loads’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., 2012, 59, (9), pp. 2056–2064 (doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2185291).
-
-
36)
-
2. Knowlton, A.E.: ‘Reactive power concepts in need of clarification’, Trans. AIEE, 1933, 52, (3), pp. 744–747.
-
-
37)
-
10. IEEE Std. 1459-2010: ‘Definitions for the measurement of electric power quantities under sinusoidal and nonsinusoidal, balanced, or unbalanced conditions’ 2010.
-
-
38)
-
27. Lev-Ari, H., Stankovic, A.M.: ‘A geometric algebra approach to decomposition of apparent power in general polyphase networks’. North American Power Symp., Starkville, USA, October 2009, pp. 1–6.
-
-
39)
-
38. Czarnecki, L.S.: ‘Comments on apparent power – a misleading quantity in non-sinusoidal power theory: are all non-sinusoidal power theories doomed to fail?’, ETEP, 1994, 4, (5), pp. 427–432 (doi: 10.1002/etep.4450040518).
-
-
1)