Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Fuzzy clustering with pairwise constraints for knowledge-driven image categorisation

Fuzzy clustering with pairwise constraints for knowledge-driven image categorisation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image and Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The identification of categories in image databases usually relies on clustering algorithms that only exploit the feature-based similarities between images. The addition of semantic information should help improve the results of the categorisation process. Pairwise constraints between some images are easy to provide, even when the user has a very incomplete prior knowledge of the image categories that one can expect to find in a database. A categorisation approach relying on such semantic information is called semi-supervised clustering. A new semi-supervised clustering algorithm, pairwise-constrained competitive agglomeration, is presented on the basis of a fuzzy cost function that takes pairwise constraints into account. Evaluations show that with a rather low number of constraints this algorithm can significantly improve the categorisation.

References

    1. 1)
      • Basu, S., Banerjee, A., Mooney, R.J.: `Active semi-supervision for pairwise constrained clustering', SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining (SDM'04), 2004, p. 251–258.
    2. 2)
      • McQueen, J.: `Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations', Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symp. on Mathmatical Statistics and Probability, 1967, p. 281–297.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • E.P. Xing , A.Y. Ng , M.I. Jordan , S. Russell , S.T.S. Becker , K. Obermayer . (2003) Distance metric learning with application to clustering with side-information, Advances in neural information processing systems.
    5. 5)
      • J.D. Banfield , A.E. Raftery . Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics , 803 - 821
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Klein, D., Kamvar, S., Manning, C.: `From instance-level constraints to space-level constraints: making the most of prior knowledge in data clustering', Proc. 19th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 2002, Sydney, Australia, p. 63–70.
    8. 8)
      • Le Saux, B., Boujemaa, N.: `Unsupervised robust clustering for image database categorization', Proc. IEEE-IAPR Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, ICPR'2002, August 2002, p. 357–362.
    9. 9)
      • Bilenko, M., Mooney, R.J.: `Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures', Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2003, Washington, DC, p. 39–48.
    10. 10)
      • R.N. Dave . Characterization and detection of noise in clustering. Pattern Recog. Lett. , 657 - 664
    11. 11)
      • A. Demiriz , K. Bennett , M. Embrechts , C.H. Dagli . (1999) Semi-supervised clustering using genetic algorithms, Intelligent engineering systems through artificial neural networks.
    12. 12)
      • Gustafson, E.E., Kessel, W.C.: `Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix', IEEE CDC, 1979, San Diego, California, p. 761–766.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • Boujemaa, N.: `On competitive unsupervized clustering', Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, ICPR'2000, September 2000, Barcelona, Spain, 1, p. 631–634.
    15. 15)
      • Basu, S., Banerjee, A., Mooney, R.J.: `Semi-supervised clustering by seeding', Proc. 19th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, ICML'02, 2002, p. 27–34.
    16. 16)
      • Wagstaff, K., Cardie, C.: `Clustering with instance-level constraints', Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 2000, p. 1103–1110.
    17. 17)
      • A.K. Jain . (1988) Algorithms for clustering data.
    18. 18)
      • A. Dempster , N. Laird , D. Rubin . Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B , 1 , 1 - 38
    19. 19)
      • J. Bezdek . (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms.
    20. 20)
      • Cohn, D., Caruana, R., McCallum, A.: `Semi-supervised clustering with user feedback', Technical report, 2003.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20050060
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20050060
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address