Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

MCYT baseline corpus: a bimodal biometric database

MCYT baseline corpus: a bimodal biometric database

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image and Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The current need for large multimodal databases to evaluate automatic biometric recognition systems has motivated the development of the MCYT bimodal database. The main purpose has been to consider a large scale population, with statistical significance, in a real multimodal procedure, and including several sources of variability that can be found in real environments. The acquisition process, contents and availability of the single-session baseline corpus are fully described. Some experiments showing consistency of data through the different acquisition sites and assessing data quality are also presented.

References

    1. 1)
      • Garcia-Salicetti, S., Beumier, C., Chollet, G., Dorizzi, B., Jardins, J.-L., Lunter, J., Ni, Y., Petrovska-Delacretaz, D.: `BIOMET: a multimodal person authentication database including face, voice, fingerprint, hand and signature modalities', Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Audio- and video-based person authentication (AVBPA), Guildford, UK, June 2003, p. 845–853.
    2. 2)
      • Simon-Zorita, D., Fierrez-Aguilar, J.: ATVS-02/2003, MCYT_Signature Technical Report, April 2003.
    3. 3)
      • Guillick, L., Cox, S.-J.: `Some statistical issues in the comparison of speech recognition algorithms', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Baltimore, USA, May 1989, vol. 1, p. 532–535.
    4. 4)
      • Messer, K., Matas, J., Kittler, J., Luettin, J., Maitre, G.: `XM2VTSDB: The extended M2VTS database', Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Audio- and video-based person authentication (AVBPA'99), Washington, DC, USA, March 1999, p. 72–77.
    5. 5)
      • NIST, http://www.nist.gov.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Precise Biometrics, http://www.precisebiometrics.com.
    8. 8)
      • Simon-Zorita, D., Ortega-Garcia, J., Sanchez-Asenjo, M., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.: `Facing position variability in minutiae-based fingerprint verification through multiple references and score normalization techniques', Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Audio- and video-based person authentication (AVBPA 2003), Guildford, UK, June 2003, p. 214–223.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • J. Fierrez-Aguilar , J. Ortega-Garcia , J. Martin-Rello , J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez . A novel function-based on-line signature verification system exploiting statistical signal modeling. submitted to IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C
    11. 11)
      • Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M., Przybocki, M.: `The DET curve in assessment of decision task performance', Proc. ESCA 5th European Conf. on Speech communications and technology (EuroSpeech'97) Rhodes, Greece, 1997, p. 1895–1898.
    12. 12)
      • Fierrez-Aguilar, J., Ortega-Garcia, J., Garcia-Romero, D., Gonzalez-Rogriguez, J.: `A comparative evaluation of fusion strategies for multimodal biometric verification', Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Audio-and video-based person authentication (AVBPA 2003), Guildford, UK, June 2003, p. 830–837.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • Dolfing, J.G.A., Aarts, E.H.L., Van Oosterhout, J.J.G.: `On-line signature verification with hidden Markov models', Proc. IEEE 14th Int. Conf. on Pattern recognition, August 1998, Brisbane, Australia, p. 1309–1312.
    15. 15)
      • Digital Persona, http://www.digitalpersona.com.
    16. 16)
      • Kim, S.H., Park, M.S., Kim, J.: `Applying personalized weights to a feature set for on-line verification', Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Document analysis and recognition, Montreal, Canada, August 1995, p. 882–885.
    17. 17)
      • MCYT Consortium site, http://www.infor.uva.es/biometria.
    18. 18)
      • Ortega, J., Simon, D., Faundez, M., Espinosa, V., Satue, A., Hernaez, I., Igarza, J.-J., Vivaracho, C., Moro, Q.-I.: `MCYT: A multimodal biometric database', Proc. COST-275 Biometric Recognition Workshop, Rome, Italy, Nov. 2002, p. 123–126, http://www.fub.it/cost275.
    19. 19)
      • Wacom, http://www.wacom.com.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • Bauer, F., Wirtz, B.: `Parameter reduction and personalized parameter selection for automatic signature verification', Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Document analysis and recognition, Montreal, Canada, August 1995, p. 183–186.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20031078
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-vis_20031078
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address