Smooth bistable S-systems

Access Full Text

Smooth bistable S-systems

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

S-systems have been used as models of biochemical systems for over 30 years. One of their hallmarks is that, although they are highly non-linear, their steady states are characterised by linear equations. This allows streamlined analyses of stability, sensitivities and gains as well as objective, mathematically controlled comparisons of similar model designs. Regular S-systems have a unique steady state at which none of the system variables is zero. This makes it difficult to represent switching phenomena, as they occur, for instance, in the expression of genes, cell cycle phenomena and signal transduction. Previously, two strategies were proposed to account for switches. One was based on a technique called recasting, which permits the modelling of any differentiable non-linearities, including bistability, but typically does not allow steady-state analyses based on linear equations. The second strategy formulated the switching system in a piecewise fashion, where each piece consisted of a regular S-system. A representation gleaned from a simplified form of recasting is proposed and it is possible to divide the characterisation of the steady states into two phases, the first of which is linear, whereas the other is non-linear, but easy to execute. The article discusses a representative pathway with two stable states and one unstable state. The pathway model exhibits strong separation between the stable states as well as hysteresis.

Inspec keywords: biochemistry; physiological models; cellular biophysics; genetics

Other keywords: switching phenomena; gene expression; smooth bistable S-systems; bistability; signal transduction; differentiable nonlinearity; biochemical systems; recasting; cell cycle phenomena; linear equations

Subjects: Model reactions in molecular biophysics; General, theoretical, and mathematical biophysics; Physics of subcellular structures

References

    1. 1)
      • A. Ferreira . Power law analysis and simulation.
    2. 2)
      • D. Fell . (1997) Understanding the control of metabolism.
    3. 3)
      • D.H. Irvine , M.A. Savageau . Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. J. Immunol. , 4 , 2100 - 2116
    4. 4)
      • E. Voit . (2000) Computational analysis of biochemical systems: a practical guide for biochemists and molecular biologists.
    5. 5)
      • W.S. Hlavacek , M.A. Savageau . Completely uncoupled and perfectly coupled gene expression in repressible systems. J. Mol. Biol. , 3 , 538 - 558
    6. 6)
      • V. Hatzimanikatis , J.E. Bailey . MCA has more to say. J. Theor. Biol. , 233 - 242
    7. 7)
      • N.V. Torres , E.O. Voit . (2002) Pathway analysis and optimization in metabolic engineering.
    8. 8)
      • D.H. Irvine , M.A. Savageau . Efficient solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations expressed in S-system canonical form. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 704 - 735
    9. 9)
      • R. Heinrich , T.A. Rapoport . A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains: General properties, control and effector strength. Eur. J. Biochem. , 1 , 89 - 95
    10. 10)
      • M.A. Savageau . Alternative designs for a genetic switch: analysis of switching times using the piecewise power-law representation. Math. Biosci. , 237 - 253
    11. 11)
      • C.M. Hill , R.D. Waight , W.G. Bardsley . Does any enzyme follow the Michaelis–Menten equation?. Mol. Cell Biochem. , 3 , 173 - 178
    12. 12)
      • J.E. Ferrell . Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. , 2 , 140 - 148
    13. 13)
      • R. Alves , M.A. Savageau . Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods. Bioinformatics , 6 , 527 - 533
    14. 14)
      • M.A. Savageau , E.E. Bittar . (1991) Critique of the enzymologist's test tube, Fundamentals of medical cell biology: a multi-volume work.
    15. 15)
      • M.A. Savageau . Biochemical systems analysis. I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J. Theor. Biol. , 3 , 365 - 369
    16. 16)
      • A. Papachristodoulou , S. Prajna . Analysis of non-polynomial systems using the sum of squares decomposition, Positive polynomials in control.
    17. 17)
      • E.O. Voit . (1991) Canonical nonlinear modeling: S-system approach to understanding complexity.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • M.A. Savageau , E.O. Voit . Recasting nonlinear differential equations as S-systems: a canonical nonlinear form. Mathem. Biosci. , 83 - 115
    20. 20)
      • D. Angeli , J.E. Ferrell , E.D. Sontag . Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 7 , 1822 - 1827
    21. 21)
      • M.A. Savageau . A theory of alternative designs for biochemical control systems. Biomed. Biochim. Acta , 6 , 875 - 880
    22. 22)
      • J.H. Schwacke , E.O. Voit . (2003) BSTLab: a Matlab toolbox for biochemical systems theory'., Eleventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • H. Kacser , J.A. Burns . The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. , 65 - 104
    25. 25)
      • A. Goldbeter . (1996) Biochemical oscillations and cellular rhythms.
    26. 26)
      • Schwacke, J.H.: BSTLab, https://bioinformatics.musc.edu/bstlab/, 2003-2005.
    27. 27)
      • M.A. Savageau . Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J. Theor. Biol. , 3 , 370 - 379
    28. 28)
      • Sorribas, A., Vilaprinyo, E., Hernandez-Bermejo, B.: `Insights on the extension of the power-law formalism to deal with saturation and cooperativity', International Conference on Molecular Systems Biology (ICMSB '04), 2004, Tahoe City, CA.
    29. 29)
      • J.H. Schwacke , E.O. Voit . Improved methods for the mathematically controlled comparison of biochemical systems. Biol. and Med. Model. , 1
    30. 30)
      • M.A. Savageau . (1976) Biochemical systems analysis: a study of function and design in molecular biology.
    31. 31)
      • U.S. Bhalla , R. Iyengar . Functional modules in biological signalling networks. Novartis Found. Symp. , 4 - 13
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-syb_20050063
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-syb_20050063
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading