Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Considerations for the assessment of early streamer emission lightning protection

Considerations for the assessment of early streamer emission lightning protection

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Science, Measurement and Technology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The procedure used for assessing the zone of protection of early streamer emission (ESE) systems is outlined, according to standards which have recently been adopted in the national codes of some countries. Much importance has been placed on the upward leader velocity by previous investigators, when assessing the zone of protection offered by an ESE device. However, by applying a simple model to the attachment process, it is shown that it is the velocity ratio, between the upward and downward leaders, that determines the theoretical zone of protection offered by any air terminal. Various assumed values of the velocity ratio are examined, with reference to existing attachment process models and measurements on natural lightning discharges. The influence of discharge intensity on ESE zone of protection is examined. A question is raised on the ability of the upward connecting discharge from an ESE device to propagate as effectively as that from a Franklin rod, in view of the fact that a leader launched ‘early’ will be subjected to a lower electric field. Evidence in the literature suggests that this consideration could prove detrimental to discharge propagation.

References

    1. 1)
      • R.J. Van Brunt , T.L. Neilson , S.L. Firebaugh . (1995) Early streamer emission air terminals lightning protection systems.
    2. 2)
      • D.W. Zipse . Lightning protection systems: advantages and disadvantages. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. , 5 , 1351 - 1361
    3. 3)
      • Chalmers, I.D., Evans, J.C., Siew, W.H., Allen, N.L., Greaves, D.A., Cotton, I.: `Laboratory testing of early streamer emission air terminals', Proceedings of international conference on Lightning protection, September 1998, Birmingham, UK, p. 412–417.
    4. 4)
      • F.A.M. Rizk . Modeling of transmission-line exposure to direct lightning strokes. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 4 , 1,983 - 1,997
    5. 5)
      • Berger, G.: `The early streamer emission lightning rod conductor', 38, Presented at International Aerospace & Ground conferenceon Lightning & static electricity, October 1992, Atlantic City, NJ.
    6. 6)
      • S. Yokoyama , K. Miyake , T. Suzuki , S. Kanao . Winter lightning on Japan sea coast – development of measuring system on progressing feature of lightning discharge. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 3 , 1,418 - 1,425
    7. 7)
      • `Protection of structures and of open areas against lightning using early streamer emission air terminals', French Standard – NF C 17–102, July 1995, English Translation.
    8. 8)
      • Aleksandrov, G.N., Berger, G., Gary, C.: `New investigations in the lightning protection of substations', 23/13–14, CIGRÉ Session Proceedings, Aug.–Sept. 1994, Paris, France.
    9. 9)
      • L. Dellera , E. Garbagnati . Part I: Description of the model and evaluation of exposure to free-standing structures. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 2,009 - 2,017
    10. 10)
      • A.J. Eriksson . The incidence of lightning strikes to power-lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 3 , 859 - 870
    11. 11)
      • `Technical Committee Documentation, 1993 Fall Meeting, Phoenix,AZ', Draft Standard NFPA 781 – F93 TCD, 1993, National Fire Protection Association Publication, Quincy, MA, 1993.
    12. 12)
      • D. Mackerras , M. Darveniza , A.C. Liew . Review of claimed enhanced lightning protection of buildings by early streamer emission air terminals. IEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol. , 1 , 1 - 10
    13. 13)
      • M.A. Uman . (1987) The lightning discharge.
    14. 14)
      • `Protection of structures and of open areas against lightning using early streamer emission air terminals', Spanish Standard – UNE 21186, June 1996.
    15. 15)
      • Dellera, L., Garbagnati, E.: `Shielding failure evaluation: application to the leader progression model', 66, Presented at international conference on Lightning and powersystems, June 1984, London, UK.
    16. 16)
      • G. Carrara , L. Thione . Switching surge strength of large air gaps: a physical approach. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 2 , 512 - 524
    17. 17)
      • R.H. Golde . (1973) Lightning protection.
    18. 18)
      • W. Beasley . Positive cloud-to-ground lightning observations. J. Geophys. Res. , 6,131 - 6,138
    19. 19)
      • M. Abdel-Salam , M.T. El-Mohandes , G. Berger , B. Senouci . Onset criterion of upward streamers from a Franklin rod. J. Electrost. , 45 - 59
    20. 20)
      • Garcia, H., Hutzler, B.: `Electrical breakdown in long air gaps – the final jump', Proceedings of 3rd international conference on Gas discharges, September 1976, London, p. 206–210.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-smt_19990025
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-smt_19990025
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address