Achieving higher perceptual quality and robustness in watermarking using Julian set patterns

Access Full Text

Achieving higher perceptual quality and robustness in watermarking using Julian set patterns

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Information Security — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Some of the most important classes of watermark detection methods in image watermarking are correlation-based algorithms. In these methods usually a pseudorandom noise pattern is embedded in the host image. The receiver can regenerate this pattern by having a key that is the seed of a random number generator. After that if the correlation between this pattern and the image that is assumed to have the watermark is higher than a predefined threshold, it means that the watermark exists and vice versa. Here, we show the advantage of using the Julian set patterns as a watermark, instead of the commonly used pseudorandom noise pattern. Julian set patterns can be regenerated in receiver with few parameters such as coefficients of its function and an initial point. These parameters can be embedded in the key. Our experiments show that the Julian set patterns not only manipulate a lower number of pixels (and therefore provide better visual quality) but also, compared with the pseudorandom noise pattern, it increases the robustness of watermark against attacks.

References

    1. 1)
      • C. Pickover . (1990) , Computers patterns chaos and beauty.
    2. 2)
      • , Corel Stock photo Library.
    3. 3)
      • M. Kutter , F.A.P. Petitcolas . A fair benchmark for image watermarking systems. Proc. SPIE , 226 - 239
    4. 4)
      • Wolfgang, R., Delp, J.: `A watermark for digital Images', Proc.IEEE Int. Conf, Image Processing, September 1996, Switzerland, 3, p. 219–222.
    5. 5)
      • G. Langelaar , I. Setyvan . Watermarking digital image and video data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , 20 - 46
    6. 6)
      • Miller, M., Cox, I.J., Bloom, J.A.: `Informed embedding: Exploiting image and detector information during watermark insertion', IEEE Int. Con. Image Processing, Canada, 2000.
    7. 7)
      • George, M., Chouinard, J.: `Spread spectrum spatial and spectral watermarking for images and video', Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, 15–18 June 1999, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
    8. 8)
      • Yaghmaee, F., Jamzad, M.: `Using Julian set patterns for higher robustness in correlation based watermarking methods', Fifth Int. Symp. on Signal Processing and Information Technology, IEEE ISSPIT 2005, December 2005, Athens, Greece.
    9. 9)
      • J. Lichtenauer , I. Setyawan , R. Lagendijk . Hiding correlation-based watermark templates using secret modulation. Proc. SPIE , 501 - 512
    10. 10)
      • Herrigel, V.A., Baumgartner, N.: `A stochastic approach to content adaptive digital image watermarking', Proc. Third Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, 1999, p. 211–236, (Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1768).
    11. 11)
      • Christian, J., van den Branden, Lambrecht, Farrell, J.E.: `Perceptual quality metric for digitally coded color images', Proc. EUSIPCO, 1996, Trieste, Italy, p. 1175–1178.
    12. 12)
      • C. Podilchuk , J. Delp . Digital watermarking: Algorithms and applications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , 4 , 33 - 46
    13. 13)
      • M. Miller , I. Cox , M. Linnartz , K.K. Parhi , T. Nishitani . (1999) A review of watermarking principles and practices, Digital signal processing for multimedia systems.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-ifs_20060025
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-ifs_20060025
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading