Fault-tolerant spatial control of a large pressurised heavy water reactor by fast output sampling technique

Buy article PDF

Abstract

A method is presented to design a spatial control system of a large pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) with the constraint that the closed loop system be stable even if one sensor or actuator has failed. Linear state models are obtained corresponding to the normal operating condition and different failure modes of the reactor. Each model is found to possess the two time scale property. Using similarity transformation each two time scale model is converted into a block diagonal form by which two subsystems, namely a fast subsystem and a slow subsystem, are easily obtained. State feedback is designed separately for the slow and the fast subsystems for each model. Then a composite state feedback gain is obtained from the state feedback gains computed for the slow and fast subsystems separately for each model. The composite state feedback so designed assigns the poles at arbitrary locations for the respective models. These composite state feedback gains are realised simultaneously by fast output sampling gains. Thus the states of the system are not needed for feedback purposes. An LMI formulation is used to overcome the undesired effects of poor error dynamics and noise sensitivity which are encountered if state feedback is realised exactly.

References

    1. 1)
      • Aliete, W.: The power-distribution control of BIBLIS- A nuclear power station and future development with process computers, Presented at IAEA Specialists Meeting on Spatial Control Problems, 1974
    2. 2)
      • Karppinen, J.: `Spatial reactor control methods', Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1977, 64, p. 657-672
    3. 3)
      • Hinchley, E., Kulgar, G.: On line control of CANDU-PHW power distribution, Presented at IAEA Specialists' Meeting on Spatial Control Problems, 1974
    4. 4)
      • Werner, H., Furuta, K.: `Simultaneous stabilization based on output measurement', Kybernetika, 1995, 31, (4), p. 395-411
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Hetric, D.L.: Dynamics of nuclear reactors, 1971, (The University of Chicago PressChicago), p. 56-65
    7. 7)
      • Cho, N.Z., Grossman, L.M.: `Optimal control for xenon spatial oscillation in load follow of a nuclear reactor', Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1983, 83, p. 136-148
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Mahmoud, M.S.: `Discrete systems with multiple time scales', Control Dyn. Syst., 1988
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • `Rajasthan Atomic Power Project', RAPP 3 & 4, Detailed project report, Feb 1989
    18. 18)
      • Kimura, H.: Pole assignment by output feedback: a longstanding open problem, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 1994, p. 2101-2105
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • Blondel, V., Gevers, M., Lindquist, A.: `Survey on the state of systems and control', Eur. J. Control, 1995, 1, (1), p. 5-23
    21. 21)
      • Werner, H.: Robust control of a laboratory flight simulator by nondynamic multirate output feedback, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 1996, p. 1575-1580
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address