Capacity of space–time block-coded CDMA systems: comparison of unitary and complementary codes

Access Full Text

Capacity of space–time block-coded CDMA systems: comparison of unitary and complementary codes

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Two major categories of CDMA signature codes, namely unitary codes and complementary codes, are of interest. All currently available 2–3G CDMA systems make use of the unitary codes, such as Gold codes, m-sequences, Walsh–Hadamard sequences and OVSF codes, all of which work on a one-code-per-channel basis. On the other hand, a CDMA system based on complementary codes works on a flock-of-codes basis. Each user in such a CDMA system is assigned a flock of codes which should be sent to a receiver via different carriers to reconstruct perfect autocorrelation and crosscorrelation functions. A comprehensive analytical study of a STBC-CDMA system using different spreading codes is given and their bit error rate performance is evaluated and compared with both analysis and simulation under Rayleigh fading and multiple-access interference. The results reveal that a STBC-CDMA system based on complementary codes offers a capacity similar to that achievable in a noise-limited system, while a STBC-CDMA system based on traditional unitary codes suffers serious interference-limited problems even with full STBC diversity gain.

Inspec keywords: Rayleigh channels; code division multiple access; error statistics; space-time codes; diversity reception; channel capacity; spread spectrum communication; block codes; radiofrequency interference; channel coding

Other keywords: flock-of-codes; complementary codes; crosscorrelation functions; Rayleigh fading channel; spreading codes; autocorrelation; bit error rate; 2-3G systems; CDMA signature codes; multiple-access interference; space-time block-code; unitary codes; STBC-CDMA system

Subjects: Codes; Multiple access communication; Electromagnetic compatibility and interference; Radio links and equipment

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • `The ETSI UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) ITU-R RTT Candidate Submission', , 29 January 1998.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • R. Gold . Maximal recursive sequences with three-valued recursive crosscorrelation functions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 154 - 156
    8. 8)
      • G.L. Stuber . (2001) Principles of mobile communication.
    9. 9)
      • Tsai, S., Khaleghi, F., Seong-Jun, Oh., Vanghi, V.: `Allocation of Walsh codes and quasiorthogonal functions in CDMA 2000 forward link', Proc. 54th IEEE VTS Conf. (UTC 2001), 2001, 2, p. 747–751.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-com_20045033
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-com_20045033
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading