Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Medium access control schemes for flat mobile wireless sensor networks

One aspect of mobile wireless sensor networks (MWSNs) is the medium access control (MAC) protocol, which is critical in terms of reliability, delay and energy consumption. This work begins with a literature review, showing that the majority of MWSN MACs are designed for hierarchical architectures, demonstrating that there is a lack of MACs intended for flat architecture MWSNs. Subsequently, the authors propose three new MAC protocols, uniquely designed for flat MWSNs. Explicitly, the proposed MACs are carrier sense multiple access with dedicated slots, network division multiple access (NDMA) with collision avoidance and NDMA with dedicated slots, which are specifically designed to work with the state-of-the-art location aware sensor routing protocol. Extensive modelling and simulation are done in dense and sparse scenarios with varying traffic levels to evaluate the impact of the proposed from the perspective of both the link and network layers. Given the uniqueness of the proposed protocols, four well-known MACs are also included to give a performance reference to the results. The MAC results show that the collision-free protocols give the best reliability and that Global time division multiple access consistently yields the highest level of throughput. This highlights the importance of taking into account both MAC and routing during the design process.

References

    1. 1)
      • 11. Rajendran, V., Obraczka, K., Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.: ‘Energy-efficient, collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks’, Wirel. Netw. J., 2006, 12, pp. 6378.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Dargie, W.: ‘A medium access control protocol that supports a seamless handover in wireless sensor networks’, J. Netw. Comput. Applic., 2012, 35, (2), pp. 778786.
    3. 3)
      • 16. IEEE 802.15.4: ‘Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low rate wireless personal area networks’, Standard, ANSI/IEEE, September 2006.
    4. 4)
      • 12. Jhumka, A., Kulkarni, S.: ‘On the design of mobility-tolerant TDMA-based media access control (MAC) protocol for mobile sensor networks’. 4th Int. Conf. Distributed Computing and Internet Technology, 2007, pp. 4253.
    5. 5)
      • 20. OPNET Technologies Inc.: ‘OPNET’, 2013, www.opnet.com, accessed on 4/8/2013.
    6. 6)
      • 17. Khan, B., Ali, F.: ‘Collision free mobility adaptive (CFMA) MAC for wireless sensor networks’, Telecommun. Syst. J., 2013, 52, (4), pp. 24592474.
    7. 7)
      • 14. Buettner, M., Yee, G., Anderson, E., et al: ‘X-MAC: a short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks’. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2006, pp. 307320.
    8. 8)
      • 3. Al-Karaki, J., Kamal, A.: ‘Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey’, IEEE Wirel. Commun., 2004, 11, (6), pp. 628.
    9. 9)
      • 19. Corbett, D., Everitt, D.: ‘A partitioned power and location aware MAC protocol for mobile ad hoc networks’. Proc. 11th European Wireless Conf. Next Generation Wireless and Mobile Communications and Services, April 2005, pp. 17.
    10. 10)
      • 5. Pham, H., Jha, S.: ‘An adaptive mobility-aware MAC protocol for sensor networks (MS-MAC)’. Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems, October 2004, pp. 558560.
    11. 11)
      • 21. Memsic Inc.: ‘IRIS’, 2014, http://www.memsic.com/userfiles/Datasheets/WSN/IRIS_Datasheet.pdf, accessed on 19/2/2014.
    12. 12)
      • 18. Bianchi, G.: ‘Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2000, 18, (3), pp. 535547.
    13. 13)
      • 6. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D.: ‘An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks’. Proc. IEEE Computer and Communications Societies 21st Annual Joint Conf., 2002, pp. 15671576.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Hayes, T., Ali, F.H.: ‘Mobile wireless sensor networks: applications and routing protocols’, ‘Handbook on next generation mobile communications systems’ (IGI Global, 2015), pp. 256292.
    15. 15)
      • 9. Gonga, A., Landsiedel, O., Johansson, M.: ‘MobiSense: power-efficient micro-mobility in wireless sensor networks’. Proc. Int. Conf. Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops, June 2011, pp. 18.
    16. 16)
      • 8. Peng, F.: ‘A novel adaptive mobility-aware MAC protocol in wireless sensor networks’, Wirel. Personal Commun. J., 2015, 81, (2), pp. 489501.
    17. 17)
      • 4. Hayes, T., Ali, F.H.: ‘Location aware sensor routing protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2016, 6, (2), pp. 4957.
    18. 18)
      • 10. Ali, M., Suleman, T., Uzmi, Z.: ‘MMAC: a mobility-adaptive, collision-free MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks’. Proc. IEEE Int. Performance, Computing and Communications Conf., April 2005, pp. 401407.
    19. 19)
      • 2. Dong, Q., Dargie, W.: ‘A survey on mobility and mobility aware MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks’, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2012, 15, (1), pp. 88100.
    20. 20)
      • 15. Khan, B., Ali, F.: ‘Mobile medium access control protocols for wireless sensor networks’, in ‘Wireless sensor networks: current status and future trends’ (CRC Press, 2012), pp. 107126.
    21. 21)
      • 7. Raviaj, P., Sharif, H., Hempel, M., et al: ‘MOBMAC – an energy efficient and low latency MAC for mobile wireless sensor networks’. Proc. Systems Communications, August 2005, pp. 370375.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2016.0067
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2016.0067
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address