© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Currently, many sensor data networks are managed using machine-to-machine (M2M) or machine type communications (MTCs) technologies. One of the key factors for the success of sensor data networks is in developments of international M2M/MTC standards. As third generation partnership project (3GPP) and oneM2M are actively working on standardising M2M/MTC specifications for 3GPP core networks and M2M common service layer, this study reviews the ongoing activities in 3GPP and oneM2M standardisation bodies, in the area of machine type or M2M communications, focusing on enhancing device, service platform, and mobile network technologies that can be useful in achieving cost efficiencies in sensor data networks.
References
-
-
1)
-
2)
-
3)
-
5. Jin, R., Che, Z., Wang, Z., et al: ‘Battery optimal scheduling based on energy balance in wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2015, 5, (6), pp. 277–282 (doi: 10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0097).
-
4)
-
5)
-
6)
-
33. Shariatmadari, H., Ratasuk, R., Iraji, S., et al: ‘Machine-type communications: current status and future perspectives toward 5G systems’, IEEE Commun. Mag. , 2015, 53, (9), pp. 10–17 (doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7263367).
-
7)
-
8)
-
3. Kumar, D.: ‘Performance analysis of energy efficient clustering protocols for maximising lifetime of wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2014, 4, (1), pp. 9–16.
-
9)
-
10)
-
11)
-
12)
-
13)
-
14)
-
15)
-
16)
-
17)
-
34. Popovski, P., Braun, V., Mayer, P., et al: .
-
18)
-
7. Kunz, A., Kim, L., Kim, H., et al: ‘Machine type communications in 3GPP: from release 10 to release 12’. 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), December 2012, pp. 1747–1752.
-
19)
-
20)
-
14. Ratasuk, R., Prasad, A., Li, Z., et al: ‘Recent advancements in M2M communications in 4G networks and evolution towards 5G’. Eighteenth Int. Conf. on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), 2015, February 2015, pp. 52–57.
-
21)
-
37. Yilmaz, O.N.C., Wang, Y.P.E., Johansson, N.A., et al: ‘Analysis of ultra-reliable and low-latency 5G communication for a factory automation use case’. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication Workshop (ICCW), 2015, pp. 1190–1195.
-
22)
-
23)
-
36. Madueño, G.C., Stefanovic, C., Popovski, P.: ‘Reliable reporting for massive M2M communications with periodic resource pooling’, IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., 2014, 3, (4), pp. 429–432 (doi: 10.1109/LWC.2014.2326674).
-
24)
-
25)
-
26)
-
27)
-
6. Das, S.N., Misra, S.: ‘Correlation-aware cross-layer design for network management of wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2015, 5, (6), pp. 263–270 (doi: 10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0110).
-
28)
-
20. Husain, S., Kunz, A., Song, J., et al: ‘Interworking architecture between oneM2M service layer and underlying networks’. Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2014, pp. 636–642.
-
29)
-
4. Azevedo, J., Santos, F., Rodrigues, M., et al: ‘Sleeping ZigBee networks at the application layer’, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2014, 4, (1), pp. 35–41.
-
30)
-
31)
-
32)
-
2. Song, J., Kunz, A., Schmidt, M., et al: ‘Connecting and managing M2M devices in the future internet’, Springer J. Mobile Netw. Appl., 2014, 19, (1), pp. 1–17 (doi: 10.1007/s11036-014-0493-z).
-
33)
-
1. Astely, D., Dahlman, E., Fodor, G., et al: ‘LTE release 12 and beyond [accepted from open call]’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2013, 51, (7), pp. 154–160 (doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553692).
-
34)
-
35)
-
36)
-
37)
-
1. Swetina, J., Lu, G.,, Jacobs, P., Ennesser, F., et al: ‘Toward a standardized common M2M service layer platform: introduction to oneM2M’, IEEE Wirel. Commun., 2014, 21, (3), pp. 20–26 (doi: 10.1109/MWC.2014.6845045).
-
38)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0052
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0052
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6