Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Two paradigms in cellular Internet-of-Things access for energy-harvesting machine-to-machine devices: push-based versus pull-based

Equipping communication apparatuses with energy-harvesting technology could achieve system sustainability without human intervention. Though the harvested energy of existing techniques is limited and intermittent, it is sufficient to power devices in low-power-consuming machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. However, due to the large number of devices with time-varying energy arrival, the medium access control protocol should be redesigned. This study focuses on studying energy-harvesting M2M uplink cellular communications from the protocol design perspective, considering the properties of M2M and energy harvesting. The authors first explore the performance of two fundamental schemes: push-based and pull-based random access channel (RACH) procedures in terms of preamble collision probability, throughput, energy efficiency, and packet delay. In the push-based scheme, devices are self-energy-aware and there is no schedule signalling cost. However, the performance degrades as the device number increases. The pull-based scheme is an alternative to have stable throughput and energy efficiency, with sacrifice of the extra scheduling cost and increasing latency. As a result, a hybrid scheme is proposed to adaptively select the preamble transmission schemes based on the estimated device number. The hybrid scheme guarantees adequate packet delay under different traffic loads and varying energy levels.

References

    1. 1)
      • 14. Briante, O., Mandalari, A.M., Molinaro, A., et al: ‘Duty-cycle optimization for machine-to-machine area networks based on frame slotted-ALOHA with energy harvesting capabilities’. 2014 20th European Wireless Conf. Proc. of European Wireless, May 2014, pp. 16.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 6. Gong, J., Zhou, S., Niu, Z., et al: ‘Energy-aware resource allocation for energy harvesting wireless communication systems’. 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC Spring), June 2013, pp. 15.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 21. 3GPP TR 37.868 v11.0.0. Study on RAN Improvements for Machine-Type Communications. In Release 11, September 2011.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 19. Lin, G.-Y., Chang, S.-R., Wei, H.-Y.: ‘Estimation and adaptation for bursty LTE random access’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2015.
    11. 11)
      • 16. 3GPP TR36.812 v11.0.0. Feasibility Study for Further Advancements for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced). In Release 12, September 2012.
    12. 12)
      • 15. Shih, M.-J., Pang, Y.-C., Lin, G.-Y., et al: ‘Performance evaluation for energy-harvesting machine-type communication in LTE-A system’. The Second Int. Workshop on 5G Mobile and Wireless Communication System for 2020 and Beyond (MWC2020 ’14), May 2014.
    13. 13)
      • 3. Di Zenobio, D., Steenhaut, K., Celidonio, M., et al: ‘A self-powered wireless sensor for water/gas metering systems’. 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), June 2012, pp. 57725776.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 20. Lin, G.-Y., Wei, H.-Y.: ‘Auction-based random access load control for time-dependent machine-to-machine communications’, IEEE Internet Things J., 2015.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0040
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0040
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address