© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This study presents an assessment on the suitability of a low-profile planar antenna for a wireless sensor network (WSN) application monitoring the water supply at fire hydrants (FHs). The antenna must have a low profile so that it can be mounted on the FH lid; it must have an omnidirectional radiation pattern so that it can communicate with base stations at low elevations; and it must operate in the 2.4 GHz industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band. Measurements show that for the majority of the 2.4 GHz ISM band, the antenna has a return loss of at least −10 dB and efficiency greater than 60%. For the FH WSN assessment, the antenna was deployed as a transmitter mounted on the FH lid above the underground FH chamber and a vertically polarised monopole antenna mounted on a mast at various specified heights above ground level was used to measure the received power as a function of distance. The path loss results were compared with those from a previous deployment, where the FH antenna was located in the FH chamber, and it is found that using the low-profile antenna reduced the path loss by at least 10 dB over the measured transmitter and receiver separation.
References
-
-
1)
-
10. Loh, T., Alexander, M., Widmer, F., Miller, P., Knight, D.: ‘Validation of a new small-antenna radiated testing range’. Third European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation, 2009, EuCAP 2009, March 2009, pp. 699–703.
-
2)
-
1. Lin, M., Wu, Y., Wassell, I.: ‘Wireless sensor network: water distribution monitoring system’. IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp., 2008, January 2008, pp. 775–778.
-
3)
-
4. Hsia, S.C., Hsu, S.W., Chang, Y.J.: ‘Remote monitoring and smart sensing for water meter system and leakage detection’, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2012, 2, (4), pp. 402–408 (doi: 10.1049/iet-wss.2012.0062).
-
4)
-
4. ‘IEEE Standard 802.15.4’. .
-
5)
-
9. Chandran, A., Conway, G., Scanlon, W.: ‘Compact slot-loaded patch antenna for 868 MHz wireless body area networks’. Antennas and Propagation Conf., 2008, LAPC 2008, Loughborough, March 2008, pp. 433–436.
-
6)
-
T.S. Bird
.
Definition and misuse of return loss.
IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag.
,
2 ,
166 -
167
-
7)
-
11. Loh, T.H., Alexander, M.: ‘New facility for minimally invasive measurements of electrically small antennas’. Antennas and Propagation Conf., 2008, LAPC 2008, Loughborough, March 2008, pp. 313–316.
-
8)
-
9)
-
15. Lin, M.: ‘Channel modelling for wireless sensor networks’. , Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2009.
-
10)
-
14. Parsons, J.D.: ‘The mobile propagation channel’ (John Wiley and Sons, 2000).
-
11)
-
G.A. Conway ,
W.G. Scanlon ,
C. Orlenius ,
C. Walker
.
In situ measurement of UHF wearable antenna radiation efficiency using a reverberation chamber.
IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.
,
271 -
274
-
12)
-
7. Conway, G., Scanlon, W., Linton, D.: ‘Low-profile microstrip patch antenna for over-body surface communication at 2.45 GHz’. IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2007, VTC2007–Spring, April 2007, pp. 392–396.
-
13)
-
3. Garcia, A., Tose, T., Ramalho, L., Sicari, D.: ‘Wireless sensor networks zigbee applied on sewage treatment station’. IET Conf. on Wireless Sensor Systems (WSS 2012), June 2012, pp. 1–5.
-
14)
-
C. Delaveaud ,
P. Leveque ,
B. Jecko
.
New kind of microstrip antenna: the monopolar wire-patch antenna.
Electron. Lett.
,
1 -
2
-
15)
-
12. ‘CST microwave studio’. .
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0047
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0047
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6