access icon free Processing algorithms for three-dimensional data compression of ultrasonic radio frequency signals

Ultrasonic systems are widely used in imaging applications for non-destructive evaluation, quality assurance and medical diagnosis. These applications require large volumes of data to be processed, stored and/or transmitted in real-time. Therefore it is essential to compress the acquired ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) signal without inadvertently degrading desirable signal features. In this paper, two algorithms for ultrasonic signal compression are analysed based on: sub-band elimination using discrete wavelet transform; and decimation/interpolation using time-shift property of Fourier transform. Both algorithms offer high signal reconstruction quality with a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) between 36 to 39 dB for minimum 80% compression. The computational loads and signal reconstruction quality are examined in order to determine the best compression method in terms of the choice of DWT kernel, sub-band decomposition architecture and computational efficiency. Furthermore, for compressing a large amount of volumetric information, three-dimensional (3D) compression algorithms are designed by utilising the temporal and spatial correlation properties of the ultrasonic RF signals. The performance analysis indicates that the 3D compression algorithm presented in this paper offers an overall 3D compression ratio of 95% with a minimum PSNR of 27 dB.

Inspec keywords: data compression; radio networks; signal reconstruction; discrete wavelet transforms

Other keywords: nondestructive evaluation; Fourier transform; peak signal-to-noise ratio; signal features; DWT kernel; PSNR; spatial correlation properties; three dimensional data compression; ultrasonic radio frequency signals; processing algorithms; ultrasonic systems; volumetric information; ultrasonic signal compression; medical diagnosis; quality assurance; temporal correlation properties; signal reconstruction quality; imaging applications; discrete wavelet transform

Subjects: Integral transforms; Radio links and equipment; Signal processing and detection

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 10. Oruklu, E., Jayakumar, N., Saniie, J.: ‘Ultrasonic signal compression using wavelet packet decomposition and adaptive Thresholding’. IEEE Ultrasonics Symp., 2008, pp. 171175.
    4. 4)
      • 11. Shi, G., Chen, C., Lin, J., Xie, X., Chen, X.: ‘Narrowband ultrasonic detection with high range resolution: separating echoes via compressed sensing and singular value decomposition’, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2012, 59, (10), pp. 22372253.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 18. Proakis, J.G., Manolakis, D.G.: ‘Digital signal processing: principles, algorithms and applications’ (Pearson, 2011, 4th edn.).
    7. 7)
      • 17. Brigham, E.: ‘Fast Fourier transform and its applications’ (Prentice Hall, 1974).
    8. 8)
      • 19. Schwarz, K.: ‘Linear phase FIR-filter in lattice structure’, IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., 1993, 1, pp. 347350.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 14. Keinert, F.: ‘Wavelets and multiwavelets’ (Chapman & Hall CRC, 2004).
    12. 12)
      • 9. Cardoso, G., Saniie, J.: ‘Performance evaluation of DWT, DCT and WHT for compression of ultrasonic signals’. IEEE Int. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conf., 2004, vol. 3, pp. 23142317.
    13. 13)
      • 4. Daubechies, I.: ‘Ten Lectures on Wavelets’. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Math, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992, vol. 61.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 13. Daubechies, I.: ‘Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets’, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 1998, XLI, pp. 909996.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 20. Desmouliers, C., Oruklu, E., Saniie, J.: ‘Adaptive 3D ultrasonic data compression using distributed processing engines’. IEEE Int. Ultrasonics Symp., 2009, pp. 694697.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0186
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0186
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading