access icon free Coherence-based analysis of modified orthogonal matching pursuit using sensing dictionary

Compressed sensing (CS) has attracted considerable attention in signal processing because of its advantage of recovering sparse signals with lower sampling rates than the Nyquist rates. Greedy pursuit algorithms such as orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) are well-known recovery algorithms in CS. In this study, the authors study a modified OMP proposed by Schnass et al., which uses a special sensing dictionary to identify the support of a sparse signal while maintaining the same computational complexity. The performance guarantee of this modified OMP in recovering the support of a sparse signal is analysed in the framework of mutual (cross) coherence. Furthermore, they discuss the modified OMP in the case of bounded noise and Gaussian noise, and show that the performance of the modified OMP in the presence of noise relies on the mutual (cross) coherence and the minimum magnitude of the non-zero elements of the sparse signal. Finally, simulations are constructed to demonstrate the performance of the modified OMP.

Inspec keywords: coherence; compressed sensing; Gaussian noise; iterative methods

Other keywords: Gaussian noise; coherence based analysis; cross coherence; greedy pursuit algorithms; sensing dictionary; mutual coherence; compressed sensing; modified orthogonal matching pursuit; sparse signal; bounded noise

Subjects: Interpolation and function approximation (numerical analysis); Interpolation and function approximation (numerical analysis); Signal processing and detection; Digital signal processing; Signal processing theory

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 19. Elad, M.: ‘Sparse and redundant representations: from theory to applications in signal and imaging processing’ (Springer, New York, 2009).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 20. Huang, A.M., Wan, Q., Yang, W.-L.: ‘Dictionary preconditioning for orthogonal matching pursuit in the presence of noise’. Int. Conf. on Communications, Circuits and Systems, 2009, pp. 419422.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 5. Majumdar, A., Ward, R.K.: ‘On the choice of compressed sensing priors and sparsifying transforms for MR image reconstruction: an experimental study’, Signal Process., 2012, 27, (9), pp. 10351048.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0164
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0164
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading