Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Hidden Markov model parameters estimation with independent multiple observations and inequality constraints

In this study, the authors focus on hidden Markov model (HMM) parameters estimation with independent multiple observations and non-linear inequality constraints. The parameters estimation process is divided into four steps: initialisation, parameters pre-estimation, parameters re-estimation and termination. The pre-estimation results are used to approximate non-linear inequality constraints to linear inequality constraints. In parameters re-estimation step, the active-set optimisation is combined with the expectation maximisation (EM) algorithm in M-step and the active set-based EM algorithm is proposed to re-estimate HMM parameters when inequality constraints are not satisfied in pre-estimation. An auxiliary function is devised for reconstructing the optimisation objective function and the convergence of the proposed algorithm is also demonstrated. Simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithm provides better performance by modifying the random error of observation data appropriately and it is powerful for industry process fault diagnosis.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 14. Martin, M., Daniel, N., Lenka, L.: ‘Constraints in particle swarm optimization of hidden Markov models’. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2006, 2006, vol. 4224, pp. 13991406.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 25. Fletcher, R.: ‘Practical methods of optimization’ (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981), part 2.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 22. Chen, Z.S., Yang, Y.M.: ‘Fault diagnostics of helicopter gearboxes based on multi-sensor mixtured hidden Markov models’, J. Vib. Acoust., 2012, 134, (3), pp. 03101010310108.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 1. Rabiner, L.R.: ‘A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition’. Proc. IEEE, 1989, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 257286.
    13. 13)
      • 15. Hu, X.H., Eberhart, E.: ‘Solving constrained nonlinear optimization problems with particle swarm optimization’. Proc. of the Sixth World Multiconference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, 2002.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 19. Huda, M.S., Yearwood, J., Ghosh, R.: ‘A hybrid algorithm for estimation of the parameters of hidden Markov model based acoustic modeling of speech signals using constraint-based genetic algorithm and expectation maximization’. Proc. of Int. Conf. on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2007.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 17. Chau, C.W., Kwong, S., Diu, C.K., et al: ‘Optimization of HMM by a genetic algorithm’. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1997, vol. 3, pp. 17271730.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 16. Paquet, U., Engelbrecht, A.P.: ‘A new particle swarm optimiser for linearly constrained optimization’. Proc. of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2003 (CEC'2003), 2003, vol. 1, pp. 227233.
    27. 27)
      • 9. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: ‘Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm’, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1977, 39, (1), pp. 138.
    28. 28)
      • 10. McLachlan, G.J., Basford, K.E.: ‘Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering’ (Dekker, New York, 1988).
    29. 29)
      • 30. Chiang, L.H., Russell, E., Braatz, R.D.: ‘Fault detection and diagnosis in industrial systems’ (Springer Verlag, 2001).
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2013.0505
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2013.0505
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address