Effects of trends and seasonalities on robustness of the Hurst parameter estimators

Access Full Text

Effects of trends and seasonalities on robustness of the Hurst parameter estimators

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Long-range dependence (LRD) is discovered in time series arising from different fields, especially in network traffic and econometrics. Detecting the presence and the intensity of LRD plays a crucial role in time-series analysis and fractional system identification. The existence of LRD is usually indicated by the Hurst parameters. Up to now, many Hurst parameter estimators have been proposed in order to identify the LRD property involved in a time series. Since different estimators have different accuracy and robustness performances, in this study, 13 most popular Hurst parameter estimators are summarised and their estimation performances are investigated. LRD processes with known Hurst parameters are generated as the control data set for the robustness evaluation. In addition, three types of LRD processes are also obtained as the test signals by adding noises in terms of means, trends and seasonalities to the control data set. All 13 Hurst parameter estimators are applied to these LRD processes to estimate the existing Hurst parameters. The estimation results are documented and quantified by the standard errors. Conclusions of the accuracy and robustness performances of the estimators are drawn by comparing the estimation results.

Inspec keywords: time series; signal processing; parameter estimation

Other keywords: fractional system identification; econometrics; LRD property; network traffic; LRD process; test signal; control data set; Hurst parameter estimator; estimation performance; time-series analysis; long-range dependence; noise

Subjects: Other topics in statistics; Simulation, modelling and identification; Other topics in statistics; Signal processing theory; Signal processing and detection

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • J. Beran . (1994) Statistics for long-memory processes.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Koutsoyiannis, D.: `Supplementary material for the paper climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological statistics', Technical Report, 2003, http://www.itia.ntua.gr/getfile/537/2/2003HSJHurstSuppl.pdf, accessed October 2012.
    7. 7)
      • H.E. Hurst . Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. , 3 , 770 - 799
    8. 8)
      • P.J. Brockwell , R.A. Davis . (2002) Introduction to time series and forecasting.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • Sheng, H., Chen, Y.Q., Qiu, T.: `Robustness analysis of Hurst estimators for multifractional Gaussian process', Proc. Fourth IFACWorkshop Fractional Differentiation and its Applications, 2010, Badajoz, Spain, p. 1–6.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Sun, R., Chen, Y.Q., Li, Q.: `The modeling and prediction of Great Salt Lake elevation time series based on ARFIMA', Proc. ASME 2007 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. 2007, 2007, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, p. 1–11.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • R.G. Clegg . A practical guide to measuring the Hurst parameter. Int. J. Simul., Syst. Sci. Technol. , 2 , 3 - 14
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • Blok, H.J.: `On the nature of the stock market: simulations and experiments', 2000, PhD, University of British Columbia, Department of Physics and Astronomy.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • J. Gubner . (2006) Probability and random processes for electrical and computer engineers.
    23. 23)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2012.0050
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2012.0050
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading