Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Measurement uncertainty of the instantaneous characteristics of non-linear coil obtained by Dommel's method

The characteristics of coil are obtained through the following measurement: the root mean square (RMS) coil current, as a function of RMS coil voltage, and the coil loss, as a function of RMS coil voltage. These values were then transformed, using Dommel's method, into instantaneous characteristics of non-linear coil, in a form of a non-linear inductance, representing saturation effect; in parallel with the non-linear resistance representing coil loss. The instantaneous characteristics are composed of peak values of resistance current and voltage, and inductance current and flux. The uncertainties of the characteristics are defined through the uncertainty of the peak values. The uncertainty of instantaneous characteristics is calculated on an example of a coil realised as unloaded iron-cored toroid transformer with a strip-wounded core made of oriented transformer sheets (M5-type) using the adaptive Monte-Carlo method (MCM) and uncertainty framework of ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’ (GUM). Results reveal the peculiarities of both methods and the impact of the uncertainty of measured values on the uncertainty of instantaneous characteristics.

References

    1. 1)
      • 30. Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: ‘Applied statistics and probability for engineers’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2003, 3rd edn.).
    2. 2)
      • 16. Sommer, K.D., Siebert, B.R.L.: ‘Systematic approach to the modeling of measurements for uncertainty evaluation’, Metrologia, 2006, 43, (4), pp. 200210.
    3. 3)
      • 25. Ferrero, A.: ‘Uncertainty: only one mathematical approach to its evaluation and expression?’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2012, 61, (8), pp. 21672178.
    4. 4)
      • 6. Chandrasena, W., McLaren, P.G., Annakkage, U.D., et al: ‘Simulation of hysteresis and eddy current effects in a power transformer’. Proc. 2003 IPST Int. Conf. Power Systems Transients, New Orleans, June 2003.
    5. 5)
      • 22. Sienkowski, S.: ‘Estimation of random variable distribution parameters by the Monte Carlo method’, Metrol. Meas. Syst., 2013, 20, (2), pp. 249262.
    6. 6)
      • 21. Borkowski, J.: ‘Systematic errors of the Lidft method: analytical form and verification by Monte Carlo method’, Metrol. Meas. Syst., 2012, 19, (4), pp. 673684.
    7. 7)
      • 20. Bich, W.: ‘From errors to probability density functions. evolution of the concept of measurement uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2012, 61, (8), pp. 21532159.
    8. 8)
      • 14. Milicevic, K., Lukacevic, I., Flegar, I.: ‘Modeling of nonlinear coil in a ferroresonant circuit’, Electric. Eng. (Archiv fur Elektrotechnik), 2009, 91, pp. 5159.
    9. 9)
      • 1. Stensland, T., Fuchs, E.F., Grady, W.M., et al: ‘Modeling of magnetizing and Dore-loss currents in single-phase transformers with voltage harmonics for use in power flow’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1997, 12, (2), pp. 768784.
    10. 10)
      • 4. Tarasiewicz, E.J., Morched, A.S., Narang, A., et al: ‘Frequency dependent eddy current models for nonlinear iron cores’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1993, 8, (2), pp. 588597.
    11. 11)
      • 8. Fuchs, E.F., Fei, R.: ‘A new computer-aided method for the efficiency measurement of low-loss transformers and inductors under nonsinusoidal operation’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1996, 11, (1), pp. 292304.
    12. 12)
      • 23. Monsef, F., Serra, R., Cozza, A.: ‘Goodness-of-fit tests in reverberation chambers: Is sample independence necessary?’, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 2015, 57, (6), pp. 17481751.
    13. 13)
      • 18. Giordani, A., Mari, L.: ‘Measurement, models, and uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2012, 61, (8), pp. 21442152.
    14. 14)
      • 5. Carpenter, K.H.: ‘Simple models for dynamic hysteresis which add frequency-dependent losses to static models’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1998, 34, (3), pp. 619622.
    15. 15)
      • 19. da Silva Hack, P., Schwengber ten Caten, C.: ‘Measurement uncertainty: literature review and research trends’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2012, 61, (8), pp. 21162124.
    16. 16)
      • 17. Sommer, K.D.: ‘Modelling of measurements, system theory, and uncertainty evaluation’, in Forbes, A.B., (Ed): ‘Data modeling for metrology and testing in measurement science’ (Birkhäuser, Cambridge, MA, 2009).
    17. 17)
      • 27. da Jornada, D., ten Caten, C., Pizzolato, M.: ‘Guidance documents on measurement uncertainty: an overview and critical analysis’, J. Meas. Sci., 2010, 1, pp. 6876.
    18. 18)
      • 10. De Leon, F., Semlyen, A.: ‘Time domain modeling of eddy current effects for transformer transients’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1993, 8, (1), pp. 271280.
    19. 19)
      • 32. JCGM 101:2008: ‘Evaluation of measurement data — supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’ – propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method’, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. Available at http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html.
    20. 20)
      • 3. Neves, W.L.A., Dommel, H.W.: ‘On modelling iron core nonlinearities’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1993, 8, (2), pp. 417425.
    21. 21)
      • 29. ‘Measurement uncertainty of the instantaneous characteristics of nonlinear coil - Extra materials’, May 28th, 2014. Available at http://www.etfos.unios.hr/~milicevi/Measurement_uncertainty-Dommels_method/.
    22. 22)
      • 15. JCGM 100:2008: ‘Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’, (GUM, originally published in 1993), Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. Available at http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html.
    23. 23)
      • 31. Solaguren-Beascoa Fernandez, M., Alegre Calderon, J.M., Bravo Diez, P.M.: ‘Implementation in MATLAB of the adaptive Monte Carlo method for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties’, Accred Qual. Assur., 2009, 14, pp. 95106.
    24. 24)
      • 7. Janssens, N.A.: ‘Magnetic cores modeling for ferroresonance computations using the harmonic balance method’. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 16441649.
    25. 25)
      • 2. Martinez-Velasco, J.A., Mork, B.A.: ‘Transformer modeling for low frequency transients – the state of the art’. Proc. 2003 IPST Int. Conf. Power Systems Transients, New Orleans, June 2003.
    26. 26)
      • 11. De Leon, F., Semlyen, A.: ‘A simple representation of dynamic hysteresis losses in power transformers’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1995, 10, (1), pp. 315321.
    27. 27)
      • 24. JGCM 200:2008, International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, (VIM), Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, with corrections (JCGM 200:2008 Corrigendum, May 2010), Sèvres, 2008. Available at http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html.
    28. 28)
      • 12. Rezaei-Zare, A., Iravani, R.: ‘On the transformer core dynamic behavior during electromagnetic transients’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2010, 25, (3), pp. 16061619.
    29. 29)
      • 9. Kral, J., Smid, R., Geirinhas Ramos, H.M., et al: ‘The lift-off effect in eddy currents on thickness modeling and measurement’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2013, 62, (7), pp. 20432049.
    30. 30)
      • 26. LEM 2000 NORMA datasheet. Available at http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/norma___omeng0200.pdf.
    31. 31)
      • 28. Azpurua, M., Tremola, C., Paez, E.: ‘Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in electromagnetic compatibility testing’, Prog. Electromagn. Res B, 2011, 34, pp. 125144.
    32. 32)
      • 13. Weng, H., Lin, X.: ‘Studies on the unusual maloperation of transformer differential protection during the nonlinear load switch-in’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2009, 24, (4), pp. 18241831.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0426
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0426
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address