Process reference model construction: implementing an evolutionary multi-method research approach

Access Full Text

Process reference model construction: implementing an evolutionary multi-method research approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Add to cart
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)
Add to cart

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Published

Process reference models can serve as a tool for simplifying process problem-solving during software development software. In the authors' research project, they developed a process reference model for software product line product derivation. The development was completed in four stages using sources in industry and academia. In this study, the authors discuss their research approach. They include an explanation on how the different stages of the research form a continuum in which the model is continually adjusted, and describe how empirical evidence was used in the development of the reference model through following an evolutionary multi-method research approach. Following a discussion on each research stage, the authors briefly present the evolution of the reference model they have developed, Pro-PD, as an exemplar of their approach. The study contributes to an improved understanding of real world reference model construction. Importantly, the authors also present lessons learned while implementing the approach. This research contributes to the practical implementation of reference model construction guidelines.

Inspec keywords: product development; software standards; evolutionary computation; software reusability

Other keywords: Pro-PD; evolutionary multi-method research; software product line product derivation; software development; process reference model construction; process problem-solving; reference model construction guidelines

Subjects: Software engineering techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • F. Ahlemann , H. Gastl , P. Fettke , P. Loos . (2006) Process model for an empirically grounded reference model construction, Reference modeling for business systems analysis.
    2. 2)
      • J.M. Morse , I.T. Teddlie . (2003) Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.
    3. 3)
      • I. Sommerville . (2006) Software engineering.
    4. 4)
      • Matinlassi, M.: `Comparison of software product line architecture design methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA', Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on. Software Engineering (ICSE 2004), 2004, Scotland, UK.
    5. 5)
      • M. Rosemann , R. Schütte , J. Becker , M. Rosemann , R. Schütte . (1999) Multi-perspective reference modelling, Referenzmodellierung. State-of-the-art und entwicklungsperpektiven.
    6. 6)
      • Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., Dhungana, D.: `Supporting product derivation by adapting and augmenting variability models', 11thInt. Software Product Line Conf., 2007.
    7. 7)
      • Reinhartz-Berger, I., Soffer, P., Sturm, A.: `A domain engineering approach to specifying and applying reference models', Proc. Workshop Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, German Informatics Society, 2005, Klagenfurt, Austria.
    8. 8)
      • R. Schütte . (1998) Principles of methodical reference modelling – construction of conigurative and adaptable models.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • D. Cooper , P. Schindler . (2003) Business research methods.
    11. 11)
      • Hotz, L., Gunter, A., Krebs, T.: `A knowledge-based product derivation process and some ideas how to integrate product development', Proc. Software Variability Management Workshop, 2003.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Bayer, J., Gacek, C., Muthig, D., Widen, T.: `PuLSE-I: deriving instances from a product line infrastructure', Seventh IEEE Int. Conf. and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, 2000, Edinburgh, UK.
    14. 14)
      • O'Leary, P., Richardson, I.: `Process support for product line application engineering', 18thEuropean Conf on Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement, EuroSPI, 2011.
    15. 15)
      • O'Leary, P., Rabiser, R., Richardson, I., Thiel, S.: `Important issues and key activities in product derivation: experiences from two independent research projects', Software Product Line Conf., 2009, San Francisco, CA, USA.
    16. 16)
      • Sinnema, M., Deelstra, S., Hoekstra, P.: `The COVAMOF derivation process', Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on Software Reuse (ICSR 2006), 2006, Turin, Italy.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • J. vom Brocke . (2003) Reference modelling, towards collaborative arrangements of design processes.
    19. 19)
      • http://www.eclipse.org/epf, Eclipse Process Framework Composer (EPF).
    20. 20)
      • P. O'Leary . (2010) Towards a product derivation process reference model for software product line organisations.
    21. 21)
      • P. Fettke , P. Loos . (2006) Reference modeling for business systems analysis.
    22. 22)
      • Y.S. Lincoln , E.G. Guba . (1985) Naturalistic enquiry.
    23. 23)
      • R.K. Yin . (1994) Case study research: design and methods.
    24. 24)
      • Winter, R., Schelp, J.: `Reference modeling and method construction: a design science perspective', Proc. 2006 ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, 2002.
    25. 25)
      • Griss, M.L.: `Implementing product-line features with component reuse', ICSR-6: Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Software Reuse, 2000, London, UK, p. 137–152.
    26. 26)
      • J. Gill , P. Johnson . (1991) Research methods for managers.
    27. 27)
      • Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Muthig, D.: `Component-based product line development: the KobrA approach', Proc. First Conf. on Software Product Lines: Experience and Research Directions, 2000.
    28. 28)
      • P. Liamputtong , D. Ezzy . (2005) Qualitative research methods.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • R. Rabiser . (2009) A user-centered approach to product configuration in software product line engineering.
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
      • P. Clements , L. Northrop . (2001) Software product lines: practices and patterns.
    33. 33)
      • J. Becker , B. Niehaves , R. Knackstedt , J. Becker , P. Delfmann . (2004) Framework for the epistemological positioning of reference modelling, Referenz-modellierung. Grundlagen, techniken und domänenbezogene Anwendung.
    34. 34)
      • P. Reason , J. Rowan , J. Rowan . (1981) Issues of validity in new paradigm research, Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research.
    35. 35)
      • C. Seale . (2000) The quality of qualitative research.
    36. 36)
      • R. Rabiser , D. Dhungana , P. Grünbacher , K. Lehner , C. Federspiel . Product configuration support for nontechnicians: customer-centered software product-line engineering. IEEE Intell. Syst. , 1 , 85 - 87
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0195
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0195
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading