Design of a competence model for testing teams

Access Full Text

Design of a competence model for testing teams

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

More and more software development organisations are paying attention to the improvement of the software testing process, because it is considered a key factor to ensure the quality of software products. However, the staff usually has problems developing testing activities because they do not have the appropriate competences to carry out these activities effectively; this results in low performance in organisations and increased costs of software products. A way to reduce this gap is developing a competence model that defines the roles who participate in the software testing activities as well as the general and technical competences required for them. Therefore this model could be applied to train staff in software testing activities and to recruit the appropriate profiles, which contribute to improving their performance. Considering that there is no published competence model specifically addressed to software testing, this study presents one that has been developed, analysing the literature and testing jobs and validated by experts in the software testing field using a survey as a validation method. So, as a result of this work, a competence model for software testing close to the software industry has been obtained.

Inspec keywords: team working; software quality; DP industry; program testing; software cost estimation

Other keywords: testing team; software product cost; software industry; software product quality; staff training; software development organisation; software testing process; software testing activity; competence model

Subjects: Software management; Diagnostic, testing, debugging and evaluating systems; Software engineering techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • T. Koomen , T. van der Aalst , B. Broekman , M. Vroon . (2006) TMap next, for result-driven testing.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Vries, H.: `Fostering ICT Skills is crucial to Europe's development', Proc. eChallenges e-2004 Conf., October 2004, Viena, Austria, p. 63–68.
    5. 5)
      • http://istqb.org/download/attachments/2326555/Expert+TM+Syllabus+Beta+Version+041511.pdf, accessed September 2011.
    6. 6)
      • (2008) PMBOK: a guide to the project management body of knowledge (Fourth edition).
    7. 7)
      • Sanz, A., Saldaña, J., García, J., Gaitero, D.: `TestPAI: a proposal for a testing process area integrated with CMMI', Proc. European Conf. on System & Software Process Improvement and Innovation, September 2008, Dublin, Ireland, p. 3–13.
    8. 8)
      • Ng, S.P., Murnane, T., Reed, K., Grant, D., Chen, T.Y.: `A preliminary survey on software testing practices in Australia', Proc. Australian Software Engineering Conf., April 2004, Melbourne, Australia, p. 116–125.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Beer, A., Ramler, R.: `The role of experience in software testing practice', Proc. European Conf. Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, September 2008, Parma, Italy, p. 258–265.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • http://istqb.org/download/attachments/2326555/Expert-Level-Syllabus-ImprovingTheTestProcess-Release-V1_0_2.pdf, accessed September 2011.
    15. 15)
      • Taipale, O., Smolander, K., Kälviäinen, H.: `Finding and ranking research directions for software testing', Proc. European Conf. on System & Software Process Improvement and Innovation, September 2005, Budapest, Hungary, p. 39–48.
    16. 16)
      • Tokar, R., Mankeforts, S.: `A survey on testing and reuse', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Software – Science, Technology and Engineering, November 2003, Herzelia, Israel, p. 164–173.
    17. 17)
      • Sanz, A., García, J., Saldaña, J., Amescua, A.: `A proposal of a process model to create a test factory', Proc. IEE. ICSE Workshop on Software Quality, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada, p. 65–70, WOSQ '09.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Clemente, P.J., Gómez, A., González, J., Sánchez, J., Sosa, E.: `Una propuesta de primer curso de programación basada en competencias transversales', Proc. Jornadas de Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informatica, July 2005, Madrid, Spain.
    20. 20)
      • I. Burnstein . (2003) Practical software testing: a process-oriented approach.
    21. 21)
      • W.J. Rothwell , H.C. Kazanas . (1993) The complete AMA guide to management development.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • Garousi, V., Mathur, A.: `Current state of the software testing education in north american academia and some recommendations for the new educators', Proc. IEEE Conf. on Software Engineering Education and Training, March 2010, Pittsburg, USA, p. 89–96.
    25. 25)
      • M. Steiner , M. Blaschke , M. Philipp , T. Schweigert . Make test process assessment similar to software process assessment – the Test SPICE approach. J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • (2005) Libro Blanco. Título de Grado en Ingeniería Informática.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • R.D. Craig , S.P. Jaskiel . (2002) Systematic software testing.
    32. 32)
      • Dawes, S., Helbig, N.: `Building government IT workforce capacity: a competency framework', Proc. Annual Int. Digital Government Research Conf., May 2006, Albany, NY, USA, p. 254–255.
    33. 33)
      • (2001) Generic ICT skills profiles: future skills for tomorrow's world.
    34. 34)
      • Karinsalo, M., Abrahamsson, P.: `Software reuse and the test development process: a combined approach', Proc. Int. Conf. on Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques and Tools, July 2004, Madrid, Spain, p. 59–68.
    35. 35)
      • Dupuis, R., Bourque, P., Abran, A.: `SWEBOK guide an overview of trial usages in the field of education', Proc. Annual Conf. on Frontiers in Education, October 2003, Westminster, USA, p. 19–23.
    36. 36)
      • http://istqb.org/download/attachments/2326555/Foundation+Level+Syllabus+%282007%29.pdf, accessed September 2011.
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
      • C. Kaner , J. Bach , B. Pettichord . (2002) Lessons learned in software testing: a context-driven approach.
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
    44. 44)
      • T. Astigarraga , E.M. Dow , C. Lara , R. Prewitt , M.R. Ward . (2010) The emerging role of software testing in curricula, Transforming engineering education: creating interdisciplinary skills for complex global environments.
    45. 45)
      • T. Koomen , P. Martin . Test process improvement: a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing. ACM SIG. Softw. Eng. Not. , 3 , 59 - 60
    46. 46)
    47. 47)
      • (2008) Software process engineering metamodel specification.
    48. 48)
    49. 49)
      • A. Abran , J.W. Moore , P. Bourque , R. Dupuis , L.L. Tripp . (2004) SWEBOK: guide to the software engineering body of knowledge: 2004 version.
    50. 50)
      • M. Rasking , R. O'Connor , T. Rout , F. McCaffery , A. Dorling . (2011) Experiences developing TMMi, Software process improvement and capability determination.
    51. 51)
      • Ekstrom, J.J., Lunt, B.M.: `Academic IT and adjacent disciplines 2010', Proc. ACM Conf. on Information Technology Education, October 2010, Midland, MI, USA, p. 1–8.
    52. 52)
      • L. Ilieş , E. Crişan , I.N. Mureşan . Best practices in project management. Rev. Int. Comput. Manag. , 1 , 43 - 51
    53. 53)
      • E. van Veenendaal . (2010) Test Maturity Model integration (TMMi).
    54. 54)
    55. 55)
    56. 56)
      • S. Pereda , F. Berrocal . (2001) Técnicas de Gestión de Recursos Humanos por Competencias.
    57. 57)
    58. 58)
      • R.G. Chung , C.Y. Wu . The identification of personnel director's competency profile through the use of the job competence assessment method. Afr. J. Bus. Mannag. , 2 , 405 - 415
    59. 59)
    60. 60)
    61. 61)
    62. 62)
    63. 63)
      • P. Knott , A. Pearson , R. Taylor . A new approach to competence analysis. Int. J. Tech. Manag. , 4 , 494 - 503
    64. 64)
      • M. Pol , R. Teunissen , E. van Veenendaal . (2002) Software testing: a guide to the TMap approach.
    65. 65)
      • (2004) Software engineering 2004: curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in software engineering.
    66. 66)
    67. 67)
      • L. Sagi-Vela . (2004) Gestión por competencias.
    68. 68)
      • Cruz, P., Villarroel, R., Mancilla, F., Visconti, M.: `A software testing process for the reference model of competisoft', Proc. Int. Conf. Chilean Computer Science Society, November 2010, Antofagasta, Chile, p. 51–59.
    69. 69)
      • http://istqb.org/download/attachments/2326555/Advanced+Level+Syllabus+%282007%29.pdf, accessed September 2011.
    70. 70)
      • W.E. Perry . (1995) Effective methods for software testing.
    71. 71)
      • Edwards, S.H.: `Using software testing to move students from trial-and-error to reflection-in-action', Proc. SIGCSE Conf., Norfolk, June 2004, Virginia, USA, p. 26–30.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0182
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0182
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading