ReAjax: a reverse engineering tool for Ajax Web applications

ReAjax: a reverse engineering tool for Ajax Web applications

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In contrast to conventional multi-page Web applications, an Ajax application is often developed as a single-page application in which content and structure are changed at runtime according to user interactions, asynchronous messages received from the server and the current state of the application. These features make Ajax applications quite hard to understand for programmers. The authors propose to support Ajax comprehension through reverse engineering. In this study, the authors propose a reverse-engineering tool, ReAjax, to build GUI-based state models from Ajax applications. ReAjax applies dynamic analysis and uses execution traces to generate a finite state machine of the target application GUI. They show that GUI-based state models obtained semi-automatically are similar to those obtained manually and they can be used for program understanding purposes. Finally, the authors summarise a case study and some usage scenarios in which ReAjax has been applied to five real Ajax applications with the purpose of evaluating its viability and effectiveness in recovering models.


    1. 1)
      • J. Garrett . Ajax: a new approach to web applications. Adapt. Path
    2. 2)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    3. 3)
      • Marchetto, A., Tonella, P., Ricca, F.: `State-based testing of ajax web applications', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Testing (ICST), 2008, Lillehammer, Norway.
    4. 4)
      • Mesbah, A., van Deursen, A.: `Invariant-based automatic testing of Ajax user interfaces', 31stInt. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2009, Canada.
    5. 5)
      • Ricca, F., Tonella, P.: `Analysis and testing of Web applications', Proc. Int. Conf. Software Engineering, ICSE 2001, 12–19 May 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, p. 25–34.
    6. 6)
      • Patel, R., Coenen, F., Martin, R., Archer, L.: `Reverse engineering of web applications: a technical review', Technical, 2007.
    7. 7)
      • Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.: `Architecture recovery of web applications', Proc. Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, 2002, Orlando, Florida, USA.
    8. 8)
      • Alalfi, M.H., Cordy, J.R., Dean, T.R.: `Automated reverse engineering of uml sequence diagrams for dynamic web applications', IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 2009, Washington, DC, USA.
    9. 9)
      • Mesbah, A., van Deursen, A.: `Crawling Ajax by inferring user interface state changes', Int. Conf. on Web Engineering (ICWE), 2008, New York, USA.
    10. 10)
      • Marchetto, A., Tonella, P., Ricca, F.: `Under and over approximation of state models recovered for ajax applications', European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), 2010, Madrid, Spain.
    11. 11)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    12. 12)
      • Dallmeier, V., Lindig, C., Wasylkowski, A., Zeller, A.: `Mining object behavior with ADABU', Proc. Fourth Int. Workshop on Dynamic Analysis (WODA), 2006, Shangai, China.
    13. 13)
      • C. Wohlin , P. Runenson , M. Hst , M. Ohlsson , B. Regnell , A. Wessln . (2000) Experimentation in software engineering – an introduction.
    14. 14)
      • Silva, J.C., Campos, J.C., Saraiva, J.: `Models for the reverse engineering of java/swing applications', Int. Workshop on Metamodels, Schemas, Grammars, and Ontologies (ateM 2006) for Reverse Engineering, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Informatik – FB 8, 2006.
    15. 15)
      • Nagarajan, A., Memon, A.M.: `Refactoring using event-based profiling', Int. Workshop on REFactoring: Achievements, 2003, Challenges, Effects.
    16. 16)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    17. 17)
      • Staiger, S.: `Reverse engineering of graphical user interfaces using static analyses', Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE), 2007, Washington, DC, USA.
    18. 18)
      • Lorenzoli, D., Mariani, L., Pezzè, M.: `Automatic generation of software behavioral models', IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2008.
    19. 19)
      • Matthijssen, N., Zaidman, A., Storey, M.A., Bull, I., van Deursen, A.: `Connecting traces: understanding client-server interactions in Ajax applications', Int. Conf. on Program Comprehension (ICPC), 2010, p. 216–225.
    20. 20)
      • Amalfitano, D., Fasolino, A., Tramontana, P.: `An iterative approach for the reverse engineering of rich internet application user interfaces', Int. Conf. on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), 2010, p. 401–410.
    21. 21)
      • Amalfitano, D., Fasolino, A.R., Tramontana, P.: `Techniques and tools for rich internet applications testing', Int. Symp. on Web Systems Evolution (WSE), 2010, p. 63–72.
    22. 22)
      • Guéhéneuc, Y.G., Mens, K., Wuyts, R.: `A comparative framework for design recovery tools', European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2006), 2006, p. 134–144.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address