Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Adaptive fusion framework based on augmented reality training

Adaptive fusion framework based on augmented reality training

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A framework for the fusion of computer-aided detection and classification algorithms for side-scan imagery is presented. The framework is based on the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence, which permits fusion of heterogeneous outputs of target detectors and classifiers. The utilisation of augmented reality for the training and evaluation of the algorithms used over a large test set permits the optimisation of their performance. In addition, this framework is adaptive regarding two aspects. First, it allows for the addition of contextual information to the decision process, giving more importance to the outputs of those algorithms that perform better in particular mission conditions. Secondly, the fusion parameters are optimised on-line to correct for mistakes, which occur while deployed.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • R.R. Coifman , D.L. Donoho . (1995) Translation-invariant de-noising, in wavelets and statistics, lecture notes in statistics.
    3. 3)
      • Aridgides, T., Fernandez, M., Dobeck, G.: `Adaptive 3 dimensional range-crossrange-frequency filter processing string for sea mine classification in side-scan sonar imagery', Proc. SPIE, 1997, 3079, p. 111–122.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Bell, J., Lianantonakis, M.: `Analysis of target scattering using a finite difference time domain model', Proc. Institute of Acoustics Conf. Sonar Transducers and Numerical Modelling, March 2005, 27, Pt. 1.
    6. 6)
      • Doherty, M.F., Landowski, J.G., Maynard, P.F.: `Side scan sonar object classification algorithms', Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, 1989, p. 417–424.
    7. 7)
      • Reed, S.: `Automatic detection and classification models for sidescan sonar imagery', April 2004, PhD, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • G. Shafer . (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence.
    12. 12)
      • Balasubramanian, R., Stevenson, M.: `Pattern recognition for underwater mine detection', Proc. CAD/CAC Conf, November 2001, Halifax, NS, Canada.
    13. 13)
      • Dobeck, G.J., Hyland, J.C., Smedley, L.: `Automated detection/classification of sea mines in sonar imagery', Proc. SPIE–Int. Society of Optics, 1997, 2079, p. 90–110.
    14. 14)
      • Ciany, C.M., Zurawski, W.: `Performance of computer aided detection/ computer aided classification and data fusion algorithms for automated detection and classification of underwater mines', CAD/CAC Conf, November 2001, Halifax, Canada.
    15. 15)
      • Dobeck, G.J.: `Fusing sonar images for mine detection and classification', Proc. SPIE, 1999, vol. 3710, p. 602–614.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20070136
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20070136
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address